File preview
Adap%ve
Vehicle
Make
(AVM)
Mr.
Paul
Eremenko,
Program
Manager
LTC
Nathan
Wiedenman,
Deputy
Program
Manager
TacHcal
Technology
Office
August
1,
2011
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
1
Historical
schedule
trends
with
complexity
240 220 ) s h 200 t n o m ( 180 g n 160 i t s e T140 d n a 120 , n o i 100 t a r g e 80 t n I , 60 n g i s e 40 D 20
Next-Gen Platform New IC design flow
Historical Cost Growth (not adjusted for inflation) Aerospace Systems (1960–present) 8-12%/yr Automobiles (1960–present) Integrated Circuits (1970–present) 4%/yr ~0%/yr
MIL-STD-499A
Aerospace Vehicle 1990s
~5X Reduction in Development Effort
New automotive design flow Automobile 1960s Aerospace Vehicle 1960s Automobile 1990s Pentium Integrated Circuit 1960s Intel 8088 Intel 286 Intel 386 Automobile Next Gen
META Goal
Integrated Circuit Next Gen Xeon
?
0 1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+07
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
Complexity* [Part Count + Source Lines of Code (SLOC)]
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
2
Status
quo
approach
to
managing
complexity
SWaP
used
as
a
proxy
metric
f or
cost,
and
dis-‐ incentivizes
abstraction
in
design
System
decomposed
based
on
arbitrary
cleavage
lines
.
.
.
MIL-‐STD-‐499A
(1969)
systems
engineering
process:
as
employed
today
Conventional
V &V
techniques
do
not
scale
to
highly
complex
or
adaptable
systems–with
large
or
infinite
numbers
of
possible
states/configurations
Re-Design
Cost Optimization
System Functional Specification
System Layout
Verification & Validation
SWaP Optimization
...
Power Data & Control Thermal Mgmt
Subsystem Design
Subsystem Testing
Resulting
architectures are
fragile
point
designs
SWaP Optimization
...
Component Design
Component Testing
.
.
.
and
detailed
design
occurs
within
these
functional
stovepipes
SWaP = Size, Weight, and Power V&V = Verification & Validation
Unmodeled
and
undesired
interactions
lead
to
emergent
behaviors
during
integration
Desirable interactions (data, power, forces & torques) Undesirable interactions (thermal, vibrations, EMI)
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
3
The
technical
problem
is
in
the
seams
Between
stages
of
produc%on
→
←
Between
system
components
Source:
MIT
ESD
(deWeck
et
al.,
2008)
Between
people
&
organiza%ons
→
Source:
DDR&E/SE
(Flowe
et
al.,
2009)
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
4
AdapHve
Vehicle
Make
vision
Shorten
development
%mes
for
complex
defense
systems
[META]
• • • • Raise
level
of
abstracHon
in
design
of
cyber-‐electromechanical
systems
Enable
correct-‐by-‐construcHon
designs
through
model-‐based
verificaHon
Compose
designs
from
component
model
library
that
characterizes
the
“seams”
Rapid
requirements
trade-‐offs;
opHmize
for
complexity
&
adaptability,
not
SWaP
ShiI
product
value
chain
toward
high-‐value
design
ac%vi%es
[iFAB]
• Bitstream-‐configurable
foundry-‐like
manufacturing
capability
for
defense
systems
• Rapid
switch-‐over
between
designs
with
minimal
learning
curve
• “Mass
customizaHon”
across
product
variants
and
families
• Crowd-‐sourcing
infrastructure
to
enable
open-‐source
development
of
cyber-‐ electromechanical
systems
[vehicleforge.mil]
• Prize-‐based
AdapHve
Make
Challenges
culminaHng
in
an
Infantry
FighHng
Vehicle
for
tesHng
alongside
a
program
of
record
[FANG]
• MoHvate
a
new
generaHon
of
designers
and
manufacturing
innovators
[MENTOR]
Democra%ze
design
[FANG]
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
5
META
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
6
NoHonal
iFAB
foundry
configuraHon
Paint & Finish
Assumptions: • 100k ft2 total space. • Need not be geographically co-located. Additive/Subtractive • All custom components in-sourced. Manufacturing • All unmod COTS components out-sourced.
Sheet Metal Fabrication Fuels & Tribology Composites Tape Laying CNC Brake 3D Printer Laser Cutter Automated Harness Loom Fuel Cell Test Set CNC CMM Articulating CMM Autoclave
• Drill & fill • Wire bundles • Robotic assembly
Welding
Harness Buildup
Electronics Fabrication
Paint Booth
Welding Robots Anodizing Tank
CNC Mill 5-Axis 6-Axis Robots
Assembly
Swaging Press
CNC
Tube
Bender
Dynamometer
Machine Instructions (STEP-NC, OpenPDK)
Logistics Tube Bending Hydraulics & Pneumatics QA / QC
iFAB Foundry Configuration
Product MetaRepresentation
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
7
Crowd-‐sourcing
infrastructure:
vehicleforge.mil
iFAB
auxiliary systems
chassis
drivetrain
Es%mated
Size
of
Component
Model
Library
Assembly
Drivetrain
Chassis/Armor
Other
Total
Unique
Parts
(upper
limit)
3,000
5,000
7,500
15,500
Total
Parts
(lower
limit)
8,000
12,000
10,000
30,000
Library
Parts
(unique
x
5)
15,000
25,000
37,500
72,500
Elements
of
a
Component
Model
Physical
aiributes
• size
and
shape
• mass
properHes
• elastodynamics
• data
• power
• mechanical
Undesirable
emissions
• thermal
• electro-‐magneHc
• vibraHonal
• blackbox
model
• failure
modes
Interfaces
Performance
Note:
EsImates
are
at
the
numbered
part
level.
Cables
and
circuit
boards
counted
as
single
part.
Excludes
variable
mission
equipment,
soPware.
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
8
Fast,
Adaptable
Next-‐generaHon
Ground
vehicle
(FANG)
Mobility/Drivetrain
Challenge
Chassis/Integrated
Survivability
Challenge
Total
PlaYorm
Challenge
SCOPE
SCOPE
SCOPE
PARTICIPANT
POOL
INCENTIVE
• Global
• Vehicle
drivetrain
to
meet
IFV
speed,
efficiency,
terrain,
reliability
objecHve
• Available
model
library
to
include:
• Hybrid-‐electric
systems
• Novel
ground
interfaces
PARTICIPANT
POOL
INCENTIVE
• Global
• Chassis
and
armor
design
to
meet
principal
IFV-‐ like
survivability
objecHves
• Available
model
library
to
include:
• Advanced
armor
concepts
• Novel
configs
(monocoque,
v-‐hulls)
PARTICIPANT
POOL
INCENTIVE
• Global
• Complete
IFV
based
on
core
Army
objecHves
and
disHlled
requirements
DESIGN
AGGREGATION
BUILD
APPROACH
• Prize
$1M
for
winning
design
• Winner(s)
judged
based
on
mulH-‐objecHve
weighHng
funcHon
• Use
of
META
metalanguage
required
• Use
of
vehicleforge.mil
opHonal
• iFAB
foundry
build
for
top
design(s)
DESIGN
AGGREGATION
BUILD
APPROACH
• Prize
$1M
for
winning
design
• Winner(s)
judged
based
on
mulH-‐objecHve
weighHng
funcHon
• Use
of
META
metalanguage
required
• Use
of
vehicleforge.mil
opHonal
• iFAB
foundry
build
for
top
design(s)
• Prize
$2M
• Winner
judged
based
on
saHsfacHon
of
constraints
and
mulH-‐airibute
preference
funcHon
(i.e.,
enHrely
objecHve
approach)
DESIGN
AGGREGATION
BUILD
APPROACH
• Use
of
META
metalanguage
required
• Use
of
vehicleforge.mil
opHonal
• iFAB
foundry
build
for
top
design(s)
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
9
Experimental
Crowd-‐derived
Combat
support
Vehicle
(XC2V)
Goal
• Experiment in crowd-sourced design • Militarily-relevant application • Existing (simple) commercial infrastructure
Approach
• Utilize existing social network of ~20,000 from Local Motors (increased by ~3,000) • Crowd-source design of a combat support vehicle • $10k in prizes • Build in existing micro-factory
Results
• 159 final designs submitted • 100 of “high caliber” according to DARPA Service Chiefs Fellows • 4 week design period • 14 week build period
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
10
Manufacturing
ExperimentaHon
and
Outreach
(MENTOR)
Goal
• Educate,
moHvate,
and
inspire
a
next-‐ generaHon
cadre
of
designers
and
manufacturing
innovators
• Inculcate
AVM-‐type
design
methods
such
that
they
become
pervasive
in
subsequent
generaHons
of
engineers
Approach
• Design
collaboraHon
using
modern
CAD
tools
and
convenHonal
social
networking
media
• Distributed
manufacturing
across
networks
of
schools
equipped
with
various
digital
manufacturing
equipment
• Run
compeHHve
prize
challenges
for
design
and
build
of
moderately
complex
systems
(e.g.
go-‐carts,
mobile
robots,
small
UAVs,
etc.)
• Outreach
ObjecHves:
• 10
schools
in
CY12
• 100
schools
in
CY13
• 1,000
schools
in
CY14
• ParHcipaHon
by
domesHc
and
foreign
schools
Picture
credits:
Robot
image
source
-‐
goroboHcs.net;
Los
Gatos
HS,
CA;
Loy
Norris
HS
,
MI;
Stoney
Creek
HS,
CA;
Lakeridge
HS,
OR;
New
Smyrna
Beach
HS,
FL;
Longhill
HS,
West
Sussex,
UK;
Brockton
HS,
MA
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
11
AVM
porpolio
schedule
CY09
FY10
CY10
FY11
META
Tools
&
Metalanguage
CY11
FY12
CY12
FY13
CY13
FY14
CY14
CY15
FY15
META-‐X
Tools
MaturaIon C2M2L-‐1
Mobility
Drivetrain
Library
C2M2L-‐3
Full
IFV
Model
Library
C2M2L-‐2
Chassis
&
Surv
Library
iFAB
Tools
&
Model
Library
XC2V
CS
Pilot
iFAB
Configure,
Build,
and
Operate
Foundry vehicleforge.mil
Crowd
Source
Design
Infrastructure
Development
and
Maintenance FANG Execute
AdapIve
Make
Challenges
Mobility/Drivetrain
Challenge
Chassis/Integrated
Survivability
Challenge
Total
PlaYorm
Challenge
Design
Fab
T&E
ComparaIve
TesIng
USMC/US
Army
IFV
Prototype
MENTOR
Distributed
Manufacturing
High
School
Outreach
SBIR
PorYolio
Large-‐Scale
Manufacturing
in
QuanIIes
of
One
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
12
AdapHve
Vehicle
Make
performer
community
META
Adven%um
Enterprises
BAE
Systems
Boeing
Dassault
Systèmes
IBM
Haifa
Research
Lab
MIT
(Dr.
Rhodes)
MIT
(Prof.
Wilcox)
Rockwell
Collins
Smart
Info
Flow
Tech
(SIFT)
SRI
Interna%onal
United
Tech
Research
Ctr
Vanderbilt
Univ
(Dr.
Bapty)
Vanderbilt
Univ
(Dr.
Neema)
Xerox
PARC
Formal
metalanguage
capable
of
integraHng
models
across
mulHple
abstracHon
levels
and
perspecHves
MulH-‐abstracHon-‐level
design
framework
with
simulaHon
traces
for
cerHficaHon
Metrics
suite
to
support
mulHple
disciplines
using
rich
corporate
historical
data
Extension
of
commercial
CATIA/DELMIA
PLM
suite
to
enable
formal
verificaHon
Formal
contract-‐based
language
to
enable
true
mulH-‐ domain,
plaporm-‐based
design
Epoch-‐based
real-‐opHon
theory
to
assess
changeability
costs
in
system
designs
Entropy-‐based
sensiHvity
and
variance-‐based
allocaHon
theories
for
early
complexity
assessment
Pre-‐verified,
reusable
design
paierns
for
hardware/ soqware
co-‐design
Unified
probabilisHc
and
non-‐probabilisHc
verificaHon
with
counter-‐examples
to
guide
design
Verifying
and
guiding
design
across
abstracHon
levels
and
domains
using
composiHonal
framework
Plaporm-‐based
generaHon
of
design
space
of
feasible
architectures
with
metric-‐based
selecHon
ComposiHonal
cross-‐domain
tool-‐chain
analysis
templates
that
support
deep
domain
analysis
Rich
model-‐based
approaches
developed
for
soqware
and
VLSI
into
the
CPS
world
FuncHon-‐based
framework
for
co-‐verificaHon
assessment
and
reasoning
at
early
stages
of
design
Boeing/General
Motors
Carnegie
Mellon
Univ
Inten%onal
SoIware
Penn
State
ARL
Univ
of
Delaware
Xerox
PARC
iFAB
Manufacturing
capability
and
process
model
library
with
describing
foundry
resources
&
human
actors
Distributed
agents/process
model
approach
for
two-‐way
interface
between
CAD
and
CAM
systems
Formal
“meta
meta”
language
to
enable
mulH-‐domain
co-‐design
of
arHfact
&
manufacturing
Agent-‐based
foundry
configuraHon
and
trade
space
visualizaHon
Developing
composiHonal
cross-‐domain
tool-‐chain
analysis
templates
for
composites
manufacturing
Rapid
construcHon
and
search
of
feasible
manufacturability
spaces
and
metrics
for
such
spaces
CreaHng
adaptable
soqware
libraries
of
manufacturing
processes
perHnent
to
the
fabricaHon
of
electro-‐ mechanical
components
and/or
assemblies
Georgia
Tech
GTRC
vehicleforge.mil
GE Research/MIT* Custom collaboration site linking to MIT DOME model repository and social network challenge platform Collaboration site based on open source distributed version control system; teamed with RedHat Collaboration site derived from KForge software and information forge site platform Credentialing users and contributions utilizing reputation-based quantitative trust management
Georgia Tech GTRI*
Vanderbilt University*
Univ of Pennsylvania*
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
13
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
14
1
Vehicle
Make
(AVM)
Mr.
Paul
Eremenko,
Program
Manager
LTC
Nathan
Wiedenman,
Deputy
Program
Manager
TacHcal
Technology
Office
August
1,
2011
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
1
Historical
schedule
trends
with
complexity
240 220 ) s h 200 t n o m ( 180 g n 160 i t s e T140 d n a 120 , n o i 100 t a r g e 80 t n I , 60 n g i s e 40 D 20
Next-Gen Platform New IC design flow
Historical Cost Growth (not adjusted for inflation) Aerospace Systems (1960–present) 8-12%/yr Automobiles (1960–present) Integrated Circuits (1970–present) 4%/yr ~0%/yr
MIL-STD-499A
Aerospace Vehicle 1990s
~5X Reduction in Development Effort
New automotive design flow Automobile 1960s Aerospace Vehicle 1960s Automobile 1990s Pentium Integrated Circuit 1960s Intel 8088 Intel 286 Intel 386 Automobile Next Gen
META Goal
Integrated Circuit Next Gen Xeon
?
0 1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+07
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
Complexity* [Part Count + Source Lines of Code (SLOC)]
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
2
Status
quo
approach
to
managing
complexity
SWaP
used
as
a
proxy
metric
f or
cost,
and
dis-‐ incentivizes
abstraction
in
design
System
decomposed
based
on
arbitrary
cleavage
lines
.
.
.
MIL-‐STD-‐499A
(1969)
systems
engineering
process:
as
employed
today
Conventional
V &V
techniques
do
not
scale
to
highly
complex
or
adaptable
systems–with
large
or
infinite
numbers
of
possible
states/configurations
Re-Design
Cost Optimization
System Functional Specification
System Layout
Verification & Validation
SWaP Optimization
...
Power Data & Control Thermal Mgmt
Subsystem Design
Subsystem Testing
Resulting
architectures are
fragile
point
designs
SWaP Optimization
...
Component Design
Component Testing
.
.
.
and
detailed
design
occurs
within
these
functional
stovepipes
SWaP = Size, Weight, and Power V&V = Verification & Validation
Unmodeled
and
undesired
interactions
lead
to
emergent
behaviors
during
integration
Desirable interactions (data, power, forces & torques) Undesirable interactions (thermal, vibrations, EMI)
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
3
The
technical
problem
is
in
the
seams
Between
stages
of
produc%on
→
←
Between
system
components
Source:
MIT
ESD
(deWeck
et
al.,
2008)
Between
people
&
organiza%ons
→
Source:
DDR&E/SE
(Flowe
et
al.,
2009)
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
4
AdapHve
Vehicle
Make
vision
Shorten
development
%mes
for
complex
defense
systems
[META]
• • • • Raise
level
of
abstracHon
in
design
of
cyber-‐electromechanical
systems
Enable
correct-‐by-‐construcHon
designs
through
model-‐based
verificaHon
Compose
designs
from
component
model
library
that
characterizes
the
“seams”
Rapid
requirements
trade-‐offs;
opHmize
for
complexity
&
adaptability,
not
SWaP
ShiI
product
value
chain
toward
high-‐value
design
ac%vi%es
[iFAB]
• Bitstream-‐configurable
foundry-‐like
manufacturing
capability
for
defense
systems
• Rapid
switch-‐over
between
designs
with
minimal
learning
curve
• “Mass
customizaHon”
across
product
variants
and
families
• Crowd-‐sourcing
infrastructure
to
enable
open-‐source
development
of
cyber-‐ electromechanical
systems
[vehicleforge.mil]
• Prize-‐based
AdapHve
Make
Challenges
culminaHng
in
an
Infantry
FighHng
Vehicle
for
tesHng
alongside
a
program
of
record
[FANG]
• MoHvate
a
new
generaHon
of
designers
and
manufacturing
innovators
[MENTOR]
Democra%ze
design
[FANG]
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
5
META
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
6
NoHonal
iFAB
foundry
configuraHon
Paint & Finish
Assumptions: • 100k ft2 total space. • Need not be geographically co-located. Additive/Subtractive • All custom components in-sourced. Manufacturing • All unmod COTS components out-sourced.
Sheet Metal Fabrication Fuels & Tribology Composites Tape Laying CNC Brake 3D Printer Laser Cutter Automated Harness Loom Fuel Cell Test Set CNC CMM Articulating CMM Autoclave
• Drill & fill • Wire bundles • Robotic assembly
Welding
Harness Buildup
Electronics Fabrication
Paint Booth
Welding Robots Anodizing Tank
CNC Mill 5-Axis 6-Axis Robots
Assembly
Swaging Press
CNC
Tube
Bender
Dynamometer
Machine Instructions (STEP-NC, OpenPDK)
Logistics Tube Bending Hydraulics & Pneumatics QA / QC
iFAB Foundry Configuration
Product MetaRepresentation
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
7
Crowd-‐sourcing
infrastructure:
vehicleforge.mil
iFAB
auxiliary systems
chassis
drivetrain
Es%mated
Size
of
Component
Model
Library
Assembly
Drivetrain
Chassis/Armor
Other
Total
Unique
Parts
(upper
limit)
3,000
5,000
7,500
15,500
Total
Parts
(lower
limit)
8,000
12,000
10,000
30,000
Library
Parts
(unique
x
5)
15,000
25,000
37,500
72,500
Elements
of
a
Component
Model
Physical
aiributes
• size
and
shape
• mass
properHes
• elastodynamics
• data
• power
• mechanical
Undesirable
emissions
• thermal
• electro-‐magneHc
• vibraHonal
• blackbox
model
• failure
modes
Interfaces
Performance
Note:
EsImates
are
at
the
numbered
part
level.
Cables
and
circuit
boards
counted
as
single
part.
Excludes
variable
mission
equipment,
soPware.
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
8
Fast,
Adaptable
Next-‐generaHon
Ground
vehicle
(FANG)
Mobility/Drivetrain
Challenge
Chassis/Integrated
Survivability
Challenge
Total
PlaYorm
Challenge
SCOPE
SCOPE
SCOPE
PARTICIPANT
POOL
INCENTIVE
• Global
• Vehicle
drivetrain
to
meet
IFV
speed,
efficiency,
terrain,
reliability
objecHve
• Available
model
library
to
include:
• Hybrid-‐electric
systems
• Novel
ground
interfaces
PARTICIPANT
POOL
INCENTIVE
• Global
• Chassis
and
armor
design
to
meet
principal
IFV-‐ like
survivability
objecHves
• Available
model
library
to
include:
• Advanced
armor
concepts
• Novel
configs
(monocoque,
v-‐hulls)
PARTICIPANT
POOL
INCENTIVE
• Global
• Complete
IFV
based
on
core
Army
objecHves
and
disHlled
requirements
DESIGN
AGGREGATION
BUILD
APPROACH
• Prize
$1M
for
winning
design
• Winner(s)
judged
based
on
mulH-‐objecHve
weighHng
funcHon
• Use
of
META
metalanguage
required
• Use
of
vehicleforge.mil
opHonal
• iFAB
foundry
build
for
top
design(s)
DESIGN
AGGREGATION
BUILD
APPROACH
• Prize
$1M
for
winning
design
• Winner(s)
judged
based
on
mulH-‐objecHve
weighHng
funcHon
• Use
of
META
metalanguage
required
• Use
of
vehicleforge.mil
opHonal
• iFAB
foundry
build
for
top
design(s)
• Prize
$2M
• Winner
judged
based
on
saHsfacHon
of
constraints
and
mulH-‐airibute
preference
funcHon
(i.e.,
enHrely
objecHve
approach)
DESIGN
AGGREGATION
BUILD
APPROACH
• Use
of
META
metalanguage
required
• Use
of
vehicleforge.mil
opHonal
• iFAB
foundry
build
for
top
design(s)
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
9
Experimental
Crowd-‐derived
Combat
support
Vehicle
(XC2V)
Goal
• Experiment in crowd-sourced design • Militarily-relevant application • Existing (simple) commercial infrastructure
Approach
• Utilize existing social network of ~20,000 from Local Motors (increased by ~3,000) • Crowd-source design of a combat support vehicle • $10k in prizes • Build in existing micro-factory
Results
• 159 final designs submitted • 100 of “high caliber” according to DARPA Service Chiefs Fellows • 4 week design period • 14 week build period
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
10
Manufacturing
ExperimentaHon
and
Outreach
(MENTOR)
Goal
• Educate,
moHvate,
and
inspire
a
next-‐ generaHon
cadre
of
designers
and
manufacturing
innovators
• Inculcate
AVM-‐type
design
methods
such
that
they
become
pervasive
in
subsequent
generaHons
of
engineers
Approach
• Design
collaboraHon
using
modern
CAD
tools
and
convenHonal
social
networking
media
• Distributed
manufacturing
across
networks
of
schools
equipped
with
various
digital
manufacturing
equipment
• Run
compeHHve
prize
challenges
for
design
and
build
of
moderately
complex
systems
(e.g.
go-‐carts,
mobile
robots,
small
UAVs,
etc.)
• Outreach
ObjecHves:
• 10
schools
in
CY12
• 100
schools
in
CY13
• 1,000
schools
in
CY14
• ParHcipaHon
by
domesHc
and
foreign
schools
Picture
credits:
Robot
image
source
-‐
goroboHcs.net;
Los
Gatos
HS,
CA;
Loy
Norris
HS
,
MI;
Stoney
Creek
HS,
CA;
Lakeridge
HS,
OR;
New
Smyrna
Beach
HS,
FL;
Longhill
HS,
West
Sussex,
UK;
Brockton
HS,
MA
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
11
AVM
porpolio
schedule
CY09
FY10
CY10
FY11
META
Tools
&
Metalanguage
CY11
FY12
CY12
FY13
CY13
FY14
CY14
CY15
FY15
META-‐X
Tools
MaturaIon C2M2L-‐1
Mobility
Drivetrain
Library
C2M2L-‐3
Full
IFV
Model
Library
C2M2L-‐2
Chassis
&
Surv
Library
iFAB
Tools
&
Model
Library
XC2V
CS
Pilot
iFAB
Configure,
Build,
and
Operate
Foundry vehicleforge.mil
Crowd
Source
Design
Infrastructure
Development
and
Maintenance FANG Execute
AdapIve
Make
Challenges
Mobility/Drivetrain
Challenge
Chassis/Integrated
Survivability
Challenge
Total
PlaYorm
Challenge
Design
Fab
T&E
ComparaIve
TesIng
USMC/US
Army
IFV
Prototype
MENTOR
Distributed
Manufacturing
High
School
Outreach
SBIR
PorYolio
Large-‐Scale
Manufacturing
in
QuanIIes
of
One
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
12
AdapHve
Vehicle
Make
performer
community
META
Adven%um
Enterprises
BAE
Systems
Boeing
Dassault
Systèmes
IBM
Haifa
Research
Lab
MIT
(Dr.
Rhodes)
MIT
(Prof.
Wilcox)
Rockwell
Collins
Smart
Info
Flow
Tech
(SIFT)
SRI
Interna%onal
United
Tech
Research
Ctr
Vanderbilt
Univ
(Dr.
Bapty)
Vanderbilt
Univ
(Dr.
Neema)
Xerox
PARC
Formal
metalanguage
capable
of
integraHng
models
across
mulHple
abstracHon
levels
and
perspecHves
MulH-‐abstracHon-‐level
design
framework
with
simulaHon
traces
for
cerHficaHon
Metrics
suite
to
support
mulHple
disciplines
using
rich
corporate
historical
data
Extension
of
commercial
CATIA/DELMIA
PLM
suite
to
enable
formal
verificaHon
Formal
contract-‐based
language
to
enable
true
mulH-‐ domain,
plaporm-‐based
design
Epoch-‐based
real-‐opHon
theory
to
assess
changeability
costs
in
system
designs
Entropy-‐based
sensiHvity
and
variance-‐based
allocaHon
theories
for
early
complexity
assessment
Pre-‐verified,
reusable
design
paierns
for
hardware/ soqware
co-‐design
Unified
probabilisHc
and
non-‐probabilisHc
verificaHon
with
counter-‐examples
to
guide
design
Verifying
and
guiding
design
across
abstracHon
levels
and
domains
using
composiHonal
framework
Plaporm-‐based
generaHon
of
design
space
of
feasible
architectures
with
metric-‐based
selecHon
ComposiHonal
cross-‐domain
tool-‐chain
analysis
templates
that
support
deep
domain
analysis
Rich
model-‐based
approaches
developed
for
soqware
and
VLSI
into
the
CPS
world
FuncHon-‐based
framework
for
co-‐verificaHon
assessment
and
reasoning
at
early
stages
of
design
Boeing/General
Motors
Carnegie
Mellon
Univ
Inten%onal
SoIware
Penn
State
ARL
Univ
of
Delaware
Xerox
PARC
iFAB
Manufacturing
capability
and
process
model
library
with
describing
foundry
resources
&
human
actors
Distributed
agents/process
model
approach
for
two-‐way
interface
between
CAD
and
CAM
systems
Formal
“meta
meta”
language
to
enable
mulH-‐domain
co-‐design
of
arHfact
&
manufacturing
Agent-‐based
foundry
configuraHon
and
trade
space
visualizaHon
Developing
composiHonal
cross-‐domain
tool-‐chain
analysis
templates
for
composites
manufacturing
Rapid
construcHon
and
search
of
feasible
manufacturability
spaces
and
metrics
for
such
spaces
CreaHng
adaptable
soqware
libraries
of
manufacturing
processes
perHnent
to
the
fabricaHon
of
electro-‐ mechanical
components
and/or
assemblies
Georgia
Tech
GTRC
vehicleforge.mil
GE Research/MIT* Custom collaboration site linking to MIT DOME model repository and social network challenge platform Collaboration site based on open source distributed version control system; teamed with RedHat Collaboration site derived from KForge software and information forge site platform Credentialing users and contributions utilizing reputation-based quantitative trust management
Georgia Tech GTRI*
Vanderbilt University*
Univ of Pennsylvania*
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
13
APPROVED
FOR
PUBLIC
RELEASE.
DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED.
14
1