Biblio

Mental workload is a popular concept in ergonomics as it provides an intuitive explanation why exceedingly cognitive task demands result in a decrease in task performance and increase the risk of fatal incidents while driving. At the same time, affective states such as frustration, also play a role in traffic safety as they increase the tendency for speedy and aggressive driving and may even degrade cognitive processing capacities. To reduce accidents due to dangerous effects of degraded cognitive processing capacities and affective biases causing human errors, it is necessary to continuously assess multiple user states simultaneously to better understand potential interactions. In two previous studies, we measured brain activity with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for separate brain based prediction of working memory load (WML) (Unni et al., 2017) and frustration levels (Ihme et al. submitted) while driving. Here, we report results from a study designed to predict simultaneously manipulated WML and frustration using data driven machine learning approaches from whole-head fNIRS brain activation measurements. 

Experiencing frustration while driving can harm cognitive processing, result in aggressive behavior and hence negatively influence driving performance and traffic safety. Being able to automatically detect frustration would allow adaptive driver assistance and automation systems to adequately react to a driver’s frustration and mitigate potential negative consequences. To identify reliable and valid indicators of driver’s frustration, we conducted two driving simulator experiments. In the first experiment, we aimed to reveal facial expressions that indicate frustration in continuous video recordings of the driver’s face taken while driving highly realistic simulator scenarios in which frustrated or non-frustrated emotional states were experienced. An automated analysis of facial expressions combined with multivariate logistic regression classification revealed that frustrated time intervals can be discriminated from non-frustrated ones with accuracy of 62.0% (mean over 30 participants). A further analysis of the facial expressions revealed that frustrated drivers tend to activate muscles in the mouth region (chin raiser, lip pucker, lip pressor). In the second experiment, we measured cortical activation with almost whole-head functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) while participants experienced frustrating and non-frustrating driving simulator scenarios. Multivariate logistic regression applied to the fNIRS measurements allowed us to discriminate between frustrated and non-frustrated driving intervals with higher accuracy of 78.1% (mean over 12 participants). Frustrated driving intervals were indicated by increased activation in the inferior frontal, putative premotor and occipito-temporal cortices. Our results show that facial and cortical markers of frustration can be informative for time resolved driver state identification in complex realistic driving situations. The markers derived here can potentially be used as an input for future adaptive driver assistance and automation systems that detect driver frustration and adaptively react to mitigate it.