Visible to the public Biblio

Filters: Keyword is frameworks  [Clear All Filters]
2021-06-24
King, Andrew, Kaleem, Faisal, Rabieh, Khaled.  2020.  A Survey on Privacy Issues of Augmented Reality Applications. 2020 IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (AINS). :32—40.
Privacy is one of the biggest concerns of the coming decade, ranking third among concerns of consumers. Data breaches and leaks are constantly in the news with companies like Facebook and Amazon being outed for their excessive data collection. With companies and governmental agencies tracking and monitoring individuals to a great degree, there are concerns that contemporary technologies that feed into these systems can be misused or misappropriated further. Frameworks currently in place fail to address many of these consumer's concerns and even the legal framework could use further elaboration to better control the way data is handled. In this paper, We address the current industrial standards, frameworks, and concerns of one of the biggest technology trends right now, the Augmented Reality. The expected prevalence of augmented reality applications necessitates a deeper study not only of their security but the expected challenges of users using such applications as well.
2018-01-23
Chisanga, E., Ngassam, E. K..  2017.  Towards a conceptual framework for information security digital divide. 2017 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa). :1–8.
Continuously improving security on an information system requires unique combination of human aspect, policies, and technology. This acts as leverage for designing an access control management approach which avails only relevant parts of a system according to an end-users' scope of work. This paper introduces a framework for information security fundamentals at organizational and theoretical levels, to identify critical success factors that are vital in assessing an organization's security maturity through a model referred to as “information security digital divide maturity framework”. The foregoing is based on a developed conceptual framework for information security digital divide. The framework strives to divide system end-users into “specific information haves and have-nots”. It intends to assist organizations to continually evaluate and improve on their security governance, standards, and policies which permit access on the basis of each end-user's work scope. The framework was tested through two surveys targeting 90 end-users and 35 security experts.
2017-12-12
Miller, J. A., Peng, H., Cotterell, M. E..  2017.  Adding Support for Theory in Open Science Big Data. 2017 IEEE World Congress on Services (SERVICES). :71–75.

Open Science Big Data is emerging as an important area of research and software development. Although there are several high quality frameworks for Big Data, additional capabilities are needed for Open Science Big Data. These include data provenance, citable reusable data, data sources providing links to research literature, relationships to other data and theories, transparent analysis/reproducibility, data privacy, new optimizations/advanced algorithms, data curation, data storage and transfer. An important part of science is explanation of results, ideally leading to theory formation. In this paper, we examine means for supporting the use of theory in big data analytics as well as using big data to assist in theory formation. One approach is to fit data in a way that is compatible with some theory, existing or new. Functional Data Analysis allows precise fitting of data as well as penalties for lack of smoothness or even departure from theoretical expectations. This paper discusses principal differential analysis and related techniques for fitting data where, for example, a time-based process is governed by an ordinary differential equation. Automation in theory formation is also considered. Case studies in the fields of computational economics and finance are considered.

2014-10-24
Aldrich, Jonathan.  2013.  The Power of Interoperability: Why Objects Are Inevitable. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming & Software. :101–116.
Three years ago in this venue, Cook argued that in their essence, objects are what Reynolds called procedural data structures. His observation raises a natural question: if procedural data structures are the essence of objects, has this contributed to the empirical success of objects, and if so, how? This essay attempts to answer that question. After reviewing Cook's definition, I propose the term service abstractions to capture the essential nature of objects. This terminology emphasizes, following Kay, that objects are not primarily about representing and manipulating data, but are more about providing services in support of higher-level goals. Using examples taken from object-oriented frameworks, I illustrate the unique design leverage that service abstractions provide: the ability to define abstractions that can be extended, and whose extensions are interoperable in a first-class way. The essay argues that the form of interoperable extension supported by service abstractions is essential to modern software: many modern frameworks and ecosystems could not have been built without service abstractions. In this sense, the success of objects was not a coincidence: it was an inevitable consequence of their service abstraction nature.