Visible to the public Biblio

Filters: Keyword is quantification  [Clear All Filters]
2023-06-09
Lee, Hwiwon, Kim, Sosun, Kim, Huy Kang.  2022.  SoK: Demystifying Cyber Resilience Quantification in Cyber-Physical Systems. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR). :178—183.
Cyber-Physical System (CPS) is becoming increasingly complicated and integrated into our daily lives, laying the foundation for advanced infrastructures, commodities, and services. In this regard, operational continuity of the system is the most critical objective, and cyber resilience quantification to evaluate and enhance it has garnered attention. However, understanding of the increasingly critical cyber risks is weak, with the focus being solely on the damage that occurs in the physical domain. To address this gap, this work takes aim at shedding some light on the cyber resilience quantification of CPS. We review the numerous resilience quantification techniques presented to date through several metrics to provide systematization of knowledge (SoK). In addition, we discuss the challenges of current quantification methods and give ideas for future research that will lead to more precise cyber resilience measurements.
2017-04-03
Taylor, Joshua, Zaffarano, Kara, Koller, Ben, Bancroft, Charlie, Syversen, Jason.  2016.  Automated Effectiveness Evaluation of Moving Target Defenses: Metrics for Missions and Attacks. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Workshop on Moving Target Defense. :129–134.

In this paper, we describe the results of several experiments designed to test two dynamic network moving target defenses against a propagating data exfiltration attack. We designed a collection of metrics to assess the costs to mission activities and the benefits in the face of attacks and evaluated the impacts of the moving target defenses in both areas. Experiments leveraged Siege's Cyber-Quantification Framework to automatically provision the networks used in the experiment, install the two moving target defenses, collect data, and analyze the results. We identify areas in which the costs and benefits of the two moving target defenses differ, and note some of their unique performance characteristics.