Biblio
Practitioners use infrastructure as code (IaC) scripts to provision servers and development environments. While developing IaC scripts, practitioners may inadvertently introduce security smells. Security smells are recurring coding patterns that are indicative of security weakness and can potentially lead to security breaches. The goal of this paper is to help practitioners avoid insecure coding practices while developing infrastructure as code (IaC) scripts through an empirical study of security smells in IaC scripts. We apply qualitative analysis on 1,726 IaC scripts to identify seven security smells. Next, we implement and validate a static analysis tool called Security Linter for Infrastructure as Code scripts (SLIC) to identify the occurrence of each smell in 15,232 IaC scripts collected from 293 open source repositories. We identify 21,201 occurrences of security smells that include 1,326 occurrences of hard-coded passwords. We submitted bug reports for 1,000 randomly-selected security smell occurrences. We obtain 212 responses to these bug reports, of which 148 occurrences were accepted by the development teams to be fixed. We observe security smells can have a long lifetime, e.g., a hard-coded secret can persist for as long as 98 months, with a median lifetime of 20 months.
Hypervisors are the main components for managing virtual machines on cloud computing systems. Thus, the security of hypervisors is very crucial as the whole system could be compromised when just one vulnerability is exploited. In this paper, we assess the vulnerabilities of widely used hypervisors including VMware ESXi, Citrix XenServer and KVM using the NIST 800-115 security testing framework. We perform real experiments to assess the vulnerabilities of those hypervisors using security testing tools. The results are evaluated using weakness information from CWE, and using vulnerability information from CVE. We also compute the severity scores using CVSS information. All vulnerabilities found of three hypervisors will be compared in terms of weaknesses, severity scores and impact. The experimental results showed that ESXi and XenServer have common weaknesses and vulnerabilities whereas KVM has fewer vulnerabilities. In addition, we discover a new vulnerability called HTTP response splitting on ESXi Web interface.
Increasing cyber-security presents an ongoing challenge to security professionals. Research continuously suggests that online users are a weak link in information security. This research explores the relationship between cyber-security and cultural, personality and demographic variables. This study was conducted in four different countries and presents a multi-cultural view of cyber-security. In particular, it looks at how behavior, self-efficacy and privacy attitude are affected by culture compared to other psychological and demographics variables (such as gender and computer expertise). It also examines what kind of data people tend to share online and how culture affects these choices. This work supports the idea of developing personality based UI design to increase users' cyber-security. Its results show that certain personality traits affect the user cyber-security related behavior across different cultures, which further reinforces their contribution compared to cultural effects.
The Software Assurance Metrics and Tool Evaluation (SAMATE) project at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has created the Software Assurance Reference Dataset (SARD) to provide researchers and software security assurance tool developers with a set of known security flaws. As part of an empirical evaluation of a runtime monitoring framework, two test suites were executed and monitored, revealing deficiencies which led to a collaboration with the NIST SAMATE team to provide replacements. Test Suites 45 and 46 are analyzed, discussed, and updated to improve accuracy, consistency, preciseness, and automation. Empirical results show metrics such as recall, precision, and F-Measure are all impacted by invalid base assumptions regarding the test suites.
A two-factor authenticated key-agreement scheme for session initiation protocol emerged as a best remedy to overcome the ascribed limitations of the password-based authentication scheme. Recently, Lu et al. proposed an anonymous two-factor authenticated key-agreement scheme for SIP using elliptic curve cryptography. They claimed that their scheme is secure against attacks and achieves user anonymity. Conversely, this paper's keen analysis points out several severe security weaknesses of the Lu et al.'s scheme. In addition, this paper puts forward an enhanced anonymous two-factor mutual authenticated key-agreement scheme for session initiation protocol using elliptic curve cryptography. The security analysis and performance analysis sections demonstrates that the proposed scheme is more robust and efficient than Lu et al.'s scheme.
Recently, various certificate-less signature (CLS) schemes have been developed using bilinear pairing to provide authenticity of message. In 2015, Jia-Lun Tsai proposed a certificate-less pairing based short signature scheme using elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) and prove its security under random oracle. However, it is shown that the scheme is inappropriate for its practical use as there is no message-signature dependency present during signature generation and verification. Thus, the scheme is vulnerable. To overcome these attacks, this paper aims to present a variant of Jia-Lun Tsai's short signature scheme. Our scheme is secured under the hardness of collusion attack algorithm with k traitors (k–-CAA). The performance analysis demonstrates that proposed scheme is efficient than other related signature schemes.
Security patterns are generic solutions that can be applied since early stages of software life to overcome recurrent security weaknesses. Their generic nature and growing number make their choice difficult, even for experts in system design. To help them on the pattern choice, this paper proposes a semi-automatic methodology of classification and the classification itself, which exposes relationships among software weaknesses, security principles and security patterns. It expresses which patterns remove a given weakness with respect to the security principles that have to be addressed to fix the weakness. The methodology is based on seven steps, which anatomize patterns and weaknesses into set of more precise sub-properties that are associated through a hierarchical organization of security principles. These steps provide the detailed justifications of the resulting classification and allow its upgrade. Without loss of generality, this classification has been established for Web applications and covers 185 software weaknesses, 26 security patterns and 66 security principles. Research supported by the industrial chair on Digital Confidence (http://confiance-numerique.clermont-universite.fr/index-en.html).