Visible to the public Biblio

Filters: Keyword is security chip  [Clear All Filters]
2022-02-07
Yuhua, Lu, Wenqiang, Wang, Zhenjiang, Pang, Yan, Li, Binbin, Xue, Shan, Ba.  2021.  A Method and System for Program Management of Security Chip Production. 2021 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers (IPEC). :461–464.
This paper analyzes the current situation and shortcomings of traditional security chip production program management, then proposes a management approach of a chip issue program management method and develope a management system based on Webservice technology. The program management method and system of chip production proposed in this paper simplifies the program management process of chip production and improves the working efficiency of chip production management.
2018-02-06
Camenisch, J., Chen, L., Drijvers, M., Lehmann, A., Novick, D., Urian, R..  2017.  One TPM to Bind Them All: Fixing TPM 2.0 for Provably Secure Anonymous Attestation. 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). :901–920.

The Trusted Platform Module (TPM) is an international standard for a security chip that can be used for the management of cryptographic keys and for remote attestation. The specification of the most recent TPM 2.0 interfaces for direct anonymous attestation unfortunately has a number of severe shortcomings. First of all, they do not allow for security proofs (indeed, the published proofs are incorrect). Second, they provide a Diffie-Hellman oracle w.r.t. the secret key of the TPM, weakening the security and preventing forward anonymity of attestations. Fixes to these problems have been proposed, but they create new issues: they enable a fraudulent TPM to encode information into an attestation signature, which could be used to break anonymity or to leak the secret key. Furthermore, all proposed ways to remove the Diffie-Hellman oracle either strongly limit the functionality of the TPM or would require significant changes to the TPM 2.0 interfaces. In this paper we provide a better specification of the TPM 2.0 interfaces that addresses these problems and requires only minimal changes to the current TPM 2.0 commands. We then show how to use the revised interfaces to build q-SDH-and LRSW-based anonymous attestation schemes, and prove their security. We finally discuss how to obtain other schemes addressing different use cases such as key-binding for U-Prove and e-cash.