Visible to the public Biblio

Filters: Keyword is Static Network  [Clear All Filters]
2020-05-15
Sharma, Dilli P., Cho, Jin-Hee, Moore, Terrence J., Nelson, Frederica F., Lim, Hyuk, Kim, Dong Seong.  2019.  Random Host and Service Multiplexing for Moving Target Defense in Software-Defined Networks. ICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). :1—6.

Moving target defense (MTD) is a proactive defense mechanism of changing the attack surface to increase an attacker's confusion and/or uncertainty, which invalidates its intelligence gained through reconnaissance and/or network scanning attacks. In this work, we propose software-defined networking (SDN)-based MTD technique using the shuffling of IP addresses and port numbers aiming to obfuscate both network and transport layers' real identities of the host and the service for defending against the network reconnaissance and scanning attacks. We call our proposed MTD technique Random Host and Service Multiplexing, namely RHSM. RHSM allows each host to use random, multiple virtual IP addresses to be dynamically and periodically shuffled. In addition, it uses short-lived, multiple virtual port numbers for an active service running on the host. Our proposed RHSM is novel in that we employ multiplexing (or de-multiplexing) to dynamically change and remap from all the virtual IPs of the host to the real IP or the virtual ports of the services to the real port, respectively. Via extensive simulation experiments, we prove how effectively and efficiently RHSM outperforms a baseline counterpart (i.e., a static network without RHSM) in terms of the attack success probability and defense cost.

2018-03-05
Alkalbani, A. S., Mantoro, T..  2017.  Security Comparison between Dynamic Static WSN for 5g Networks. 2017 Second International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC). :1–4.
In the recent years, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) and its applications have obtained considerable momentum. However, security and power limits of these networks are still important matters as security and power limits remain an important problem in WSN. This paper contributes to provide a simulation-based analysis of the energy efficiency, accuracy and path length of static and dynamic wireless sensor networks for 5G environment. Results are analyzed and discussed to show the difference between these two types of sensor networks. The static networks more accurate than dynamic networks. Data move from source to destination in shortest path in dynamic networks compared to static ones.
Alkalbani, A. S., Mantoro, T..  2017.  Security Comparison between Dynamic Static WSN for 5g Networks. 2017 Second International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC). :1–4.
In the recent years, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) and its applications have obtained considerable momentum. However, security and power limits of these networks are still important matters as security and power limits remain an important problem in WSN. This paper contributes to provide a simulation-based analysis of the energy efficiency, accuracy and path length of static and dynamic wireless sensor networks for 5G environment. Results are analyzed and discussed to show the difference between these two types of sensor networks. The static networks more accurate than dynamic networks. Data move from source to destination in shortest path in dynamic networks compared to static ones.