Biblio

Random K-out graphs, denoted \$$\backslash$mathbbH(n;K)\$, are generated by each of the \$n\$ nodes drawing \$K\$ out-edges towards \$K\$ distinct nodes selected uniformly at random, and then ignoring the orientation of the arcs. Recently, random K-out graphs have been used in applications as diverse as random (pairwise) key predistribution in ad-hoc networks, anonymous message routing in crypto-currency networks, and differentially-private federated averaging. In many applications, connectivity of the random K-out graph when some of its nodes are dishonest, have failed, or have been captured is of practical interest. We provide a comprehensive set of results on the connectivity and giant component size of \$$\backslash$mathbbH(n;K\_n,$\backslash$gamma\_n)\$, i.e., random K-out graph when \textsubscriptn of its nodes, selected uniformly at random, are deleted. First, we derive conditions for \textsubscriptn and \$n\$ that ensure, with high probability (whp), the connectivity of the remaining graph when the number of deleted nodes is \$$\backslash$gamma\_n=Ømega(n)\$ and \$$\backslash$gamma\_n=o(n)\$, respectively. Next, we derive conditions for \$$\backslash$mathbbH(n;K\_n, $\backslash$gamma\_n)\$ to have a giant component, i.e., a connected subgraph with \$Ømega(n)\$ nodes, whp. This is also done for different scalings of \textsubscriptn and upper bounds are provided for the number of nodes outside the giant component. Simulation results are presented to validate the usefulness of the results in the finite node regime.

The previous consideration of power grid focuses on the power system itself, however, the recent work is aiming at both power grid and communication network, this coupling networks are firstly called as interdependent networks. Prior study on modeling interdependent networks always extracts main features from real networks, the model of network A and network B are completely symmetrical, both degree distribution in intranetwork and support pattern in inter-network, but in reality this circumstance is hard to attain. In this paper, we deliberately set both networks with same topology in order to specialized research the support pattern between networks. In terms of initial failure from power grid or communication network, we find the remaining survival fraction is greatly disparate, and the failure initially from power grid is more harmful than failure initially from communication network, which all show the vulnerability of interdependency and meantime guide us to pay more attention to the protection measures for power grid.