Biblio
Filters: Keyword is malware detection systems [Clear All Filters]
Malware Evasion Attack and Defense. 2019 49th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W). :34–38.
.
2019. Machine learning (ML) classifiers are vulnerable to adversarial examples. An adversarial example is an input sample which is slightly modified to induce misclassification in an ML classifier. In this work, we investigate white-box and grey-box evasion attacks to an ML-based malware detector and conduct performance evaluations in a real-world setting. We compare the defense approaches in mitigating the attacks. We propose a framework for deploying grey-box and black-box attacks to malware detection systems.
Predicting Signatures of Future Malware Variants. 2017 12th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software (MALWARE). :126–132.
.
2017. One of the challenges of malware defense is that the attacker has the advantage over the defender. In many cases, an attack is successful and causes damage before the defender can even begin to prepare a defense. The ability to anticipate attacks and prepare defenses before they occur would be a significant scientific and technological development with practical applications in cybersecurity. In this paper, we present a method to augment machine learning-based malware detection systems by predicting signatures of future malware variants and injecting these variants into the defensive system as a vaccine. Our method uses deep learning to learn patterns of malware evolution from family histories. These evolution patterns are then used to predict future family developments. Our experiments show that a detection system augmented with these future malware signatures is able to detect future malware variants that could not be detected by the detection system alone. In particular, it detected 11 new malware variants without increasing false positives, while providing up to 5 months of lead time between prediction and attack.