Visible to the public Biblio

Filters: Keyword is classification process  [Clear All Filters]
2018-09-28
Li, Z., Li, S..  2017.  Random forest algorithm under differential privacy. 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT). :1901–1905.

Trying to solve the risk of data privacy disclosure in classification process, a Random Forest algorithm under differential privacy named DPRF-gini is proposed in the paper. In the process of building decision tree, the algorithm first disturbed the process of feature selection and attribute partition by using exponential mechanism, and then meet the requirement of differential privacy by adding Laplace noise to the leaf node. Compared with the original algorithm, Empirical results show that protection of data privacy is further enhanced while the accuracy of the algorithm is slightly reduced.

2018-06-20
Kebede, T. M., Djaneye-Boundjou, O., Narayanan, B. N., Ralescu, A., Kapp, D..  2017.  Classification of Malware programs using autoencoders based deep learning architecture and its application to the microsoft malware Classification challenge (BIG 2015) dataset. 2017 IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON). :70–75.

Distinguishing and classifying different types of malware is important to better understanding how they can infect computers and devices, the threat level they pose and how to protect against them. In this paper, a system for classifying malware programs is presented. The paper describes the architecture of the system and assesses its performance on a publicly available database (provided by Microsoft for the Microsoft Malware Classification Challenge BIG2015) to serve as a benchmark for future research efforts. First, the malicious programs are preprocessed such that they are visualized as gray scale images. We then make use of an architecture comprised of multiple layers (multiple levels of encoding) to carry out the classification process of those images/programs. We compare the performance of this approach against traditional machine learning and pattern recognition algorithms. Our experimental results show that the deep learning architecture yields a boost in performance over those conventional/standard algorithms. A hold-out validation analysis using the superior architecture shows an accuracy in the order of 99.15%.