Visible to the public Biblio

Filters: Keyword is openflow switch  [Clear All Filters]
2020-06-29
Sun, Wenwen, Li, Yi, Guan, Shaopeng.  2019.  An Improved Method of DDoS Attack Detection for Controller of SDN. 2019 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering Technology (CCET). :249–253.
For controllers of Software Defined Network (SDN), Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks are still the simplest and most effective way to attack. Aiming at this problem, a real-time DDoS detection attack method for SDN controller is proposed. The method first uses the entropy to detect whether the flow is abnormal. After the abnormal warning is issued, the flow entry of the OpenFlow switch is obtained, and the DDoS attack feature in the SDN environment is analyzed to extract important features related to the attack. The BiLSTM-RNN neural network algorithm is used to train the data set, and the BiLSTM model is generated to classify the real-time traffic to realize the DDoS attack detection. Experiments show that, compared with other methods, this method can efficiently implement DDoS attack traffic detection and reduce controller overhead in SDN environment.
2018-11-19
Huang, X., Du, X., Song, B..  2017.  An Effective DDoS Defense Scheme for SDN. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). :1–6.

In this paper, we propose a scheme to protect the Software Defined Network(SDN) controller from Distributed Denial-of-Service(DDoS) attacks. We first predict the amount of new requests for each openflow switch periodically based on Taylor series, and the requests will then be directed to the security gateway if the prediction value is beyond the threshold. The requests that caused the dramatic decrease of entropy will be filtered out and rules will be made in security gateway by our algorithm; the rules of these requests will be sent to the controller. The controller will send the rules to each switch to make them direct the flows matching with the rules to the honey pot. The simulation shows the averages of both false positive and false negative are less than 2%.