Biblio
Advanced persistent threats (APT) have increased in recent times as a result of the rise in interest by nation-states and sophisticated corporations to obtain high profile information. Typically, APT attacks are more challenging to detect since they leverage zero-day attacks and common benign tools. Furthermore, these attack campaigns are often prolonged to evade detection. We leverage an approach that uses a provenance graph to obtain execution traces of host nodes in order to detect anomalous behavior. By using the provenance graph, we extract features that are then used to train an online adaptive metric learning. Online metric learning is a deep learning method that learns a function to minimize the separation between similar classes and maximizes the separation between dis-similar instances. We compare our approach with baseline models and we show our method outperforms the baseline models by increasing detection accuracy on average by 11.3 % and increases True positive rate (TPR) on average by 18.3 %.
Due to the recent technological development, home appliances and electric devices are equipped with high-performance hardware device. Since demand of hardware devices is increased, production base become internationalized to mass-produce hardware devices with low cost and hardware vendors outsource their products to third-party vendors. Accordingly, malicious third-party vendors can easily insert malfunctions (also known as "hardware Trojans'') into their products. In this paper, we design six kinds of hardware Trojans at a gate-level netlist, and apply a neural-network (NN) based hardware-Trojan detection method to them. The designed hardware Trojans are different in trigger circuits. In addition, we insert them to normal circuits, and detect hardware Trojans using a machine-learning-based hardware-Trojan detection method with neural networks. In our experiment, we learned Trojan-infected benchmarks using NN, and performed cross validation to evaluate the learned NN. The experimental results demonstrate that the average TPR (True Positive Rate) becomes 72.9%, the average TNR (True Negative Rate) becomes 90.0%.