Biblio

Cloud-based payments, virtual car keys, and digital rights management are examples of consumer electronics applications that use secure software. White-box implementations of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) are important building blocks of secure software systems, and the attack of Billet, Gilbert, and Ech-Chatbi (BGE) is a well-known attack on such implementations. A drawback from the adversary’s or security tester’s perspective is that manual reverse engineering of the implementation is required before the BGE attack can be applied. This paper presents a method to automate the BGE attack on a class of white-box AES implementations with a specific type of external encoding. The new method was implemented and applied successfully to a CHES 2016 capture the flag challenge.

In the past few years, Internet of Things (IoT) devices have emerged and spread everywhere. Many researchers have been motivated to study the security issues of IoT devices due to the sensitive information they carry about their owners. Privacy is not simply about encryption and access authorization, but also about what kind of information is transmitted, how it used and to whom it will be shared with. Thus, IoT manufacturers should be compelled to issue Privacy Policy Agreements for their respective devices as well as ensure that the actual behavior of the IoT device complies with the issued privacy policy. In this paper, we implement a test bed for ensuring compliance of Internet of Things data disclosure to the corresponding privacy policy. The fundamental approach used in the test bed is to capture the data traffic between the IoT device and the cloud, between the IoT device and its application on the smart-phone, and between the IoT application and the cloud and analyze those packets for various features. We test 11 IoT manufacturers and the results reveal that half of those IoT manufacturers do not have an adequate privacy policy specifically for their IoT devices. In addition, we prove that the action of two IoT devices does not comply with what they stated in their privacy policy agreement.