Biblio

Routing protocol for low power and lossy networks (RPL) is a fundamental routing protocol of 6LoWPAN, a centre correspondence standard for the Internet of Things. RPL outplay other wireless sensor and ad hoc routing protocols in the aspect of service (QoS), device management, and energy-saving performance. The Rank definition in RPL addresses several issues, such as path optimization, loop avoidance, and power overhead management. RPL rank and version number attacks are two types of the most common forms of RPL attacks, may have crucial ramification for RPL networks. The research directed upon these attacks includes considerable vulnerabilities and efficiency issues. The rank attack on sensor networks is perhaps the utmost common, posing a challenge to network connectivity by falling data or disrupting routing routes. This work presents a rank attack detection system focusing on RPL. Considering many of such issues a method has been proposed using spatial correlation function (SCF) and Dijkstra's algorithm considering parameters like energy and throughput.

Routing protocol running over low power and lossy networks (RPL) is currently one of the main routing protocols for the Internet of Things (IoT). This protocol has some vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers to change its behavior and deteriorate its performance. In the RPL rank attack, a malicious node announces a wrong rank, which leads the neighboring’s nodes to choose this node as a preferred parent. In this study, we used different metrics to assess RPL protocol in the presence of misbehaving nodes, namely the overhead, convergence time, energy consumption, preferred parent changes, and network lifetime. Our simulations results show that a mobile environment is more damaged by the rank attack than a static environment.

Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Network (RPL) is a light weight routing protocol designed for LLN (Low Power Lossy Networks). It is a source routing protocol. Due to constrained nature of resources in LLN, RPL is exposed to various attacks such as blackhole attack, wormhole attack, rank attack, version attack, etc. IDS (Intrusion Detection System) is one of the countermeasures for detection and prevention of attacks for RPL based loT. Traditional IDS techniques are not suitable for LLN due to certain characteristics like different protocol stack, standards and constrained resources. In this paper, we have presented various IDS research contribution for RPL based routing attacks. We have also classified the proposed IDS in the literature, according to the detection techniques. Therefore, this comparison will be an eye-opening stuff for future research in mitigating routing attacks for RPL based IoT.

The Internet of Things (IoT) is an emerging technology that plays a vital role in interconnecting various objects into a network to provide desired services within its resource constrained characteristics. In IoT, the Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy network (RPL) is the standardized proactive routing protocol that achieves satisfying resource consumption, but it does not consider the node's routing behavior for forwarding data packets. The malicious intruders exploit these loopholes for launching various forms of routing attacks. Different security mechanisms have been introduced for detecting these attacks singly. However, the launch of multiple attacks such as Rank attack and Sybil attacks simultaneously in the IoT network is one of the devastating and destructive situations. This problem can be solved by establishing secure routing with trustworthy nodes. The trustworthiness of the nodes is determined using trust evaluation methods, where the parameters considered are based on the factors that influence in detecting the attacks. In this work, Providing Routing Security using the Technique of Collective Trust (PROTECT) mechanism is introduced, and it aims to provide a secure RPL routing by simultaneously detecting both Rank and Sybil attacks in the network. The advantage of the proposed scheme is highlighted by comparing its performance with the performance of the Sec-Trust protocol in terms of detection accuracy, energy consumption, and throughput.