Visible to the public Biblio

Filters: Keyword is wavelet  [Clear All Filters]
2021-02-08
Wang, R., Li, L., Hong, W., Yang, N..  2009.  A THz Image Edge Detection Method Based on Wavelet and Neural Network. 2009 Ninth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems. 3:420—424.

A THz image edge detection approach based on wavelet and neural network is proposed in this paper. First, the source image is decomposed by wavelet, the edges in the low-frequency sub-image are detected using neural network method and the edges in the high-frequency sub-images are detected using wavelet transform method on the coarsest level of the wavelet decomposition, the two edge images are fused according to some fusion rules to obtain the edge image of this level, it then is projected to the next level. Afterwards the final edge image of L-1 level is got according to some fusion rule. This process is repeated until reaching the 0 level thus to get the final integrated and clear edge image. The experimental results show that our approach based on fusion technique is superior to Canny operator method and wavelet transform method alone.

2020-03-09
Hermawan, Indra, Ma’sum, M. Anwar, Riskyana Dewi Intan, P, Jatmiko, Wisnu, Wiweko, Budi, Boediman, Alfred, Pradekso, Beno K..  2019.  Temporal feature and heuristics-based Noise Detection over Classical Machine Learning for ECG Signal Quality Assessment. 2019 International Workshop on Big Data and Information Security (IWBIS). :1–8.
This study proposes a method for ECG signals quality assessment (SQA) by using temporal feature, and heuristic rule. The ECG signal will be classified as acceptable or unacceptable. Seven types of noise were able to be detected by the prosed method. The noises are: FL, TVN, BW, AB, MA, PLI and AWGN. The proposed method is aimed to have better performance for SQA than classical machine learning method. The experiment is conducted by using 1000 instances ECG signal. The experiment result shows that db8 has the best performance with 0.86, 0.85 and 85.6% on lead-1 signal and 0.69, 0.79, and 74% on lead-5 signal for specificity, sensitivity and accuracy respectively. Compared to the classical machine learning, the proposed heuristic method has same accuracy but has 48% and 31% better specificity for lead-1 and lead-5. It means that the proposed method has far better ability to detect noise.