Biblio

This paper presents our results from identifying anddocumenting false positives generated by static code analysistools. By false positives, we mean a static code analysis toolgenerates a warning message, but the warning message isnot really an error. The goal of our study is to understandthe different kinds of false positives generated so we can (1)automatically determine if an error message is truly indeed a truepositive, and (2) reduce the number of false positives developersand testers must triage. We have used two open-source tools andone commercial tool in our study. The results of our study haveled to 14 core false positive patterns, some of which we haveconfirmed with static code analysis tool developers.

In an attempt to support customization, many web applications allow the integration of third-party server-side plugins that offer diverse functionality, but also open an additional door for security vulnerabilities. In this paper we study the use of static code analysis tools to detect vulnerabilities in the plugins of the web application. The goal is twofold: 1) to study the effectiveness of static analysis on the detection of web application plugin vulnerabilities, and 2) to understand the potential impact of those plugins in the security of the core web application. We use two static code analyzers to evaluate a large number of plugins for a widely used Content Manage-ment System. Results show that many plugins that are current-ly deployed worldwide have dangerous Cross Site Scripting and SQL Injection vulnerabilities that can be easily exploited, and that even widely used static analysis tools may present disappointing vulnerability coverage and false positive rates.