Visible to the public Biblio

Filters: Keyword is FTP  [Clear All Filters]
2023-09-01
Lan, James Kin Wah, Lee, Frankie Kin Wah.  2022.  Drone Forensics: A Case Study on DJI Mavic Air 2. 2022 24th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT). :291—296.
With the inundation of more cost effective and improved flight performance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) into the consumer market, we have seen more uses of these for both leisure and business purposes. As such, demand for digital forensic examination on these devices has seen an increase as well. This research will explore and discuss the forensic examination process on one of the more popular brands of UAV in Singapore, namely DJI. The findings are from the examination of the exposed File Transfer Protocol (FTP) channel and the extraction of the Data-at-Rest on the memory chip of the drone. The extraction was done using the Chip-Off and Chip-On technique.
2021-03-09
Hossain, M. D., Ochiai, H., Doudou, F., Kadobayashi, Y..  2020.  SSH and FTP brute-force Attacks Detection in Computer Networks: LSTM and Machine Learning Approaches. 2020 5th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS). :491—497.

Network traffic anomaly detection is of critical importance in cybersecurity due to the massive and rapid growth of sophisticated computer network attacks. Indeed, the more new Internet-related technologies are created, the more elaborate the attacks become. Among all the contemporary high-level attacks, dictionary-based brute-force attacks (BFA) present one of the most unsurmountable challenges. We need to develop effective methods to detect and mitigate such brute-force attacks in realtime. In this paper, we investigate SSH and FTP brute-force attack detection by using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) deep learning approach. Additionally, we made use of machine learning (ML) classifiers: J48, naive Bayes (NB), decision table (DT), random forest (RF) and k-nearest-neighbor (k-NN), for additional detection purposes. We used the well-known labelled dataset CICIDS2017. We evaluated the effectiveness of the LSTM and ML algorithms, and compared their performance. Our results show that the LSTM model outperforms the ML algorithms, with an accuracy of 99.88%.