Biblio

Filters: Author is Tessier, R.  [Clear All Filters]
2018-02-02
Pouraghily, A., Wolf, T., Tessier, R..  2017.  Hardware support for embedded operating system security. 2017 IEEE 28th International Conference on Application-specific Systems, Architectures and Processors (ASAP). :61–66.

Internet-connected embedded systems have limited capabilities to defend themselves against remote hacking attacks. The potential effects of such attacks, however, can have a significant impact in the context of the Internet of Things, industrial control systems, smart health systems, etc. Embedded systems cannot effectively utilize existing software-based protection mechanisms due to limited processing capabilities and energy resources. We propose a novel hardware-based monitoring technique that can detect if the embedded operating system or any running application deviates from the originally programmed behavior due to an attack. We present an FPGA-based prototype implementation that shows the effectiveness of such a security approach.

2017-02-27
Kainth, M., Krishnan, L., Narayana, C., Virupaksha, S. G., Tessier, R..  2015.  Hardware-assisted code obfuscation for FPGA soft microprocessors. 2015 Design, Automation Test in Europe Conference Exhibition (DATE). :127–132.

Soft microprocessors are vital components of many embedded FPGA systems. As the application domain for FPGAs expands, the security of the software used by soft processors increases in importance. Although software confidentiality approaches (e.g. encryption) are effective, code obfuscation is known to be an effective enhancement that further deters code understanding for attackers. The availability of specialization in FPGAs provides a unique opportunity for code obfuscation on a per-application basis with minimal hardware overhead. In this paper we describe a new technique to obfuscate soft microprocessor code which is located outside the FPGA chip in an unprotected area. Our approach provides customizable, data-dependent control flow modification to make it difficult for attackers to easily understand program behavior. The application of the approach to three benchmarks illustrates a control flow cyclomatic complexity increase of about 7× with a modest logic overhead for the soft processor.