Biblio

Capability machines such as CHERI provide memory capabilities that can be used by compilers to provide security benefits for compiled code (e.g., memory safety). The existing C to CHERI compiler, for example, achieves memory safety by following a principle called “pointers as capabilities” (PAC). Informally, PAC says that a compiler should represent a source language pointer as a machine code capability. But the security properties of PAC compilers are not yet well understood. We show that memory safety is only one aspect, and that PAC compilers can provide significant additional security guarantees for partial programs: the compiler can provide security guarantees for a compilation unit, even if that compilation unit is later linked to attacker-provided machine code.As such, this paper is the first to study the security of PAC compilers for partial programs formally. We prove for a model of such a compiler that it is fully abstract. The proof uses a novel proof technique (dubbed TrICL, read trickle), which should be of broad interest because it reuses the whole-program compiler correctness relation for full abstraction, thus saving work. We also implement our scheme for C on CHERI, show that we can compile legacy C code with minimal changes, and show that the performance overhead of compiled code is roughly proportional to the number of cross-compilation-unit function calls.

Meta-programs are programs that generate other programs, but in weakly type-safe systems, type-checking a meta-program only establishes its own type safety, and generated programs need additional type-checking after generation. Strong type safety of a meta-program implies type safety of any generated object program, a property with important engineering benefits. Current strongly type-safe systems suffer from expressivity limitations and cannot support many meta-programs found in practice, for example automatic generation of lenses. To overcome this, we move away from the idea of staged meta-programming. Instead, we use an off-the-shelf dependently-typed language as the meta-language and a relatively standard, intrinsically well-typed representation of the object language. We scale this approach to practical meta-programming, by choosing a high-level, explicitly typed intermediate representation as the object language, rather than a surface programming language. We implement our approach as a library for the Glasgow Haskell Compiler (GHC) and evaluate it on several meta-programs, including a deriveLenses meta-program taken from a real-world Haskell lens library. Our evaluation demonstrates expressivity beyond the state of the art and applicability to real settings, at little cost in terms of code size.

A compiler is fully-abstract if the compilation from source language programs to target language programs reflects and preserves behavioural equivalence. Such compilers have important security benefits, as they limit the power of an attacker interacting with the program in the target language to that of an attacker interacting with the program in the source language. Proving compiler full-abstraction is, however, rather complicated. A common proof technique is based on the back-translation of target-level program contexts to behaviourally-equivalent source-level contexts. However, constructing such a back-translation is problematic when the source language is not strong enough to embed an encoding of the target language. For instance, when compiling from the simply-typed λ-calculus (λτ) to the untyped λ-calculus (λu), the lack of recursive types in λτ prevents such a back-translation. We propose a general and elegant solution for this problem. The key insight is that it suffices to construct an approximate back-translation. The approximation is only accurate up to a certain number of steps and conservative beyond that, in the sense that the context generated by the back-translation may diverge when the original would not, but not vice versa. Based on this insight, we describe a general technique for proving compiler full-abstraction and demonstrate it on a compiler from λτ to λu . The proof uses asymmetric cross-language logical relations and makes innovative use of step-indexing to express the relation between a context and its approximate back-translation. We believe this proof technique can scale to challenging settings and enable simpler, more scalable proofs of compiler full-abstraction.