Title | Front-End IoT Application for the Bitcoin based on Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET) |
Publication Type | Conference Paper |
Year of Publication | 2019 |
Authors | Kumar, M Ashok, Radhesyam, V., SrinivasaRao, B |
Conference Name | 2019 Third International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC) |
Keywords | active exchanges, BC IoT, bitcoin, Bitcoin block chain customer, Bitcoin distributor, bitcoin security, Bitcoin store, block block, block-dependent IoT applications, blockchain, complete block, constructive exchanges, cryptocurrencies, data privacy, elapsed time, financial data processing, front-end applications, front-end IoT application, front-end Web applications, Human Behavior, Internet, Internet applications, Internet of Things, IoT, key location, mandatory IoT gadget, neighborhood gadget, PoET, possible designs, pubcrawl, registry agreements, remote Bitcoin customers, remote blockchain client, remote server, Scalability |
Abstract | There are some registry agreements that may be appropriate for the Internet of Things (IoT), including Bitcoin, Hyperledger Fabric and IOTA. This article presents quickly and examines them in terms of the progress of Internet applications. Block-dependent IoT applications can consolidate the chain's rationale (smart contracts) and front-end, portable or front-end web applications. We present three possible designs for BC IoT front-end applications. They vary depending on the Bitcoin block chain customer (neighborhood gadget, remote server) and the key location needed to manage active exchanges. The vital requirements of these projects, which use Bitcoin to organize constructive exchanges, are the volumes of information, the area and time of the complete block and block block, and the entry of the Bitcoin store. The implications of these surveys show that it is unlikely that a full Bitcoin distributor will continue to operate reliably with a mandatory IoT gadget. Then, designing with remote Bitcoin customers is, in all respects, a suitable methodology in which there are two minor alternatives and vary in key storage / management. Similarly, we recommend using the design with a unique match between the IoT gadget and the remote blockchain client to reduce system activity and improve security. We hope you also have the ability to operate with versatile verses with low control and low productivity. Our review eliminates the contradictions between synthesis methodologies, but the final choice for a particular registration agreement and the original technique completely depends on the proposed use case. |
DOI | 10.1109/ICISC44355.2019.9036391 |
Citation Key | kumar_front-end_2019 |