Visible to the public The Role of Interactivity in Local Differential Privacy

TitleThe Role of Interactivity in Local Differential Privacy
Publication TypeConference Paper
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsJoseph, Matthew, Mao, Jieming, Neel, Seth, Roth, Aaron
Conference Name2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)
Date PublishedNov. 2019
PublisherIEEE
ISBN Number978-1-7281-4952-3
KeywordsComplexity theory, compositionality, Compounds, Computing Theory and Compositionality, data privacy, Differential privacy, equivalent sequentially interactive protocol, fully interactive compositional protocol, Human Behavior, human factors, hypothesis testing problem, interaction, local differential privacy, privacy, privacy guarantee, Protocols, pubcrawl, Testing
Abstract

We study the power of interactivity in local differential privacy. First, we focus on the difference between fully interactive and sequentially interactive protocols. Sequentially interactive protocols may query users adaptively in sequence, but they cannot return to previously queried users. The vast majority of existing lower bounds for local differential privacy apply only to sequentially interactive protocols, and before this paper it was not known whether fully interactive protocols were more powerful. We resolve this question. First, we classify locally private protocols by their compositionality, the multiplicative factor by which the sum of a protocol's single-round privacy parameters exceeds its overall privacy guarantee. We then show how to efficiently transform any fully interactive compositional protocol into an equivalent sequentially interactive protocol with a blowup in sample complexity linear in this compositionality. Next, we show that our reduction is tight by exhibiting a family of problems such that any sequentially interactive protocol requires this blowup in sample complexity over a fully interactive compositional protocol. We then turn our attention to hypothesis testing problems. We show that for a large class of compound hypothesis testing problems - which include all simple hypothesis testing problems as a special case - a simple noninteractive test is optimal among the class of all (possibly fully interactive) tests.

URLhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8948625
DOI10.1109/FOCS.2019.00015
Citation Keyjoseph_role_2019