Scientific Understanding of Policy Complexity - July 2017
Public Audience
Purpose: To highlight project progress. Information is generally at a higher level which is accessible to the interested public. All information contained in the report (regions 1-3) is a Government Deliverable/CDRL.
PI(s): Ninghui Li, Robert Proctor, Emerson Murphy-Hill
Researchers: Jing Chen, Haining Chen, Huangyi Ge, Matt Witte
HARD PROBLEM(S) ADDRESSED
- Policy-Governed Secure Collaboration - Security policies can be very complex, in the sense that they are difficult for humans to understand and update. We are interested in two kinds of complexity measures. The first is a measure of the inherent complexity of a policy. The second is a measure of the representational complexity, which is the complexity of a particular way to encode the policy. It is desirable to have a scientific understanding of both kinds of complexity.
- Human Behavior - Our policy complexity is based on how easy for humans to understand and write policies. There is thus a human behavior aspect to it.
PUBLICATIONS
Report papers written as a results of this research. If accepted by or submitted to a journal, which journal. If presented at a conference, which conference.
ACCOMPLISHMENT HIGHLIGHTS
- We propose a path-sensitive normalization technique for access control checks, and developed a tool for analyzing the inconsistency of access control checks. Using the tool, we have found several previous unknown vulnerabilities in Android, several of them potentially having serious consequences.