Biblio

This paper compares the known method of Analytical Design of Aggregated Regulators (ADAR) with the method of Analytical Design of Optimal Regulators (ADOR). Both equivalence of these methods and the significant difference in the approaches to the analytical synthesis of control laws are shown. It is shown that the ADAR method has significant advantages associated with a simpler and analytical procedure of design of nonlinear laws for optimal control, clear physical representation of weighting factors of optimality criteria, validity and unambiguity of selecting regulator setting parameters, more simple approach to the analysis of the closed-loop system asymptotic stability. These advantages are illustrated by the examples of synthesis.