Biblio

This paper deals with a problem that arises in vertical composition of protocols, i.e., when a channel protocol is used to encrypt and transport arbitrary data from an application protocol that uses the channel. Our work proves that we can verify that the channel protocol ensures its security goals independent of a particular application. More in detail, we build a general paradigm to express vertical composition of an application protocol and a channel protocol, and we give a transformation of the channel protocol where the application payload messages are replaced by abstract constants in a particular way that is feasible for standard automated verification tools. We prove that this transformation is sound for a large class of channel and application protocols. The requirements that channel and application have to satisfy for the vertical composition are all of an easy-to-check syntactic nature.

In protocol verification we observe a wide spectrum from fully automated methods to interactive theorem proving with proof assistants like Isabelle/HOL. The latter provide overwhelmingly high assurance of the correctness, which automated methods often cannot: due to their complexity, bugs in such automated verification tools are likely and thus the risk of erroneously verifying a flawed protocol is non-negligible. There are a few works that try to combine advantages from both ends of the spectrum: a high degree of automation and assurance. We present here a first step towards achieving this for a more challenging class of protocols, namely those that work with a mutable long-term state. To our knowledge this is the first approach that achieves fully automated verification of stateful protocols in an LCF-style theorem prover. The approach also includes a simple user-friendly transaction-based protocol specification language embedded into Isabelle, and can also leverage a number of existing results such as soundness of a typed model