Biblio

Web technologies are typically built with time constraints and security vulnerabilities. Automatic software vulnerability scanners are common tools for detecting such vulnerabilities among software developers. It helps to illustrate the program for the attacker by creating a great deal of engagement within the program. SQL Injection and Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) are two of the most commonly spread and dangerous vulnerabilities in web apps that cause to the user. It is very important to trust the findings of the site vulnerability scanning software. Without a clear idea of the accuracy and the coverage of the open-source tools, it is difficult to analyze the result from the automatic vulnerability scanner that provides. The important to do a comparison on the key figure on the automated vulnerability scanners because there are many kinds of a scanner on the market and this comparison can be useful to decide which scanner has better performance in term of SQL Injection and Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. In this paper, a method by Jose Fonseca et al, is used to compare open-source automated vulnerability scanners based on detection coverage and a method by Yuki Makino and Vitaly Klyuev for precision rate. The criteria vulnerabilities will be injected into the web applications which then be scanned by the scanners. The results then are compared by analyzing the precision rate and detection coverage of vulnerability detection. Two leading open source automated vulnerability scanners will be evaluated. In this paper, the scanner that being utilizes is OW ASP ZAP and Skipfish for comparison. The results show that from precision rate and detection rate scope, OW ASP ZAP has better performance than Skipfish by two times for precision rate and have almost the same result for detection coverage where OW ASP ZAP has a higher number in high vulnerabilities.