Biblio

Industrial Control Systems (ICS) such as Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA), Distributed Control Systems (DCS) and Distributed Automation Systems (DAS) control and monitor critical infrastructures. In recent years, proliferation of cyber-attacks to ICS revealed that a large number of security vulnerabilities exist in such systems. Excessive security solutions are proposed to remove the vulnerabilities and improve the security of ICS. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of them presented or developed a security test-bed which is vital to evaluate the security of ICS tools and products. In this paper, a test-bed is proposed for evaluating the security of industrial applications by providing different metrics for static testing, dynamic testing and network testing in industrial settings. Using these metrics and results of the three tests, industrial applications can be compared with each other from security point of view. Experimental results on several real world applications indicate that proposed test-bed can be successfully employed to evaluate and compare the security level of industrial applications.

Software security is an important concern in the world moving towards Information Technology. Detecting software vulnerabilities is a difficult and resource consuming task. Therefore, automatic vulnerability prediction would help development teams to predict vulnerability-prone components and prioritize security inspection efforts. Software source code metrics and data mining techniques have been recently used to predict vulnerability-prone components. Some of previous studies used a set of unit complexity and coupling metrics to predict vulnerabilities. In this study, first, we compare the predictability power of these two groups of metrics in cross-project vulnerability prediction. In cross-project vulnerability prediction we create the prediction model based on datasets of completely different projects and try to detect vulnerabilities in another project. The experimental results show that unit complexity metrics are stronger vulnerability predictors than coupling metrics. Then, we propose a new set of coupling metrics which are called Included Vulnerable Header (IVH) metrics. These new coupling metrics, which consider interaction of application modules with outside of the application, predict vulnerabilities highly better than regular coupling metrics. Furthermore, adding IVH metrics to the set of complexity metrics improves Recall of the best predictor from 60.9% to 87.4% and shows the best set of metrics for cross-project vulnerability prediction.