Biblio
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) are a promising technology to secure low-cost devices. A PUF is a function whose values depend on the physical characteristics of the underlying hardware: the same PUF implemented on two identical integrated circuits will return different values. Thus, a PUF can be used as a unique fingerprint identifying one specific physical device among (apparently) identical copies that run the same firmware on the same hardware. PUFs, however, are tricky to implement, and a number of attacks have been reported in the literature, often due to wrong assumptions about the provided security guarantees and/or the attacker model. In this paper, we present the first mechanized symbolic model for PUFs that allows for precisely reasoning about their security with respect to a variegate set of attackers. We consider mutual authentication protocols based on different kinds of PUFs and model attackers that are able to access PUF values stored on servers, abuse the PUF APIs, model the PUF behavior and exploit error correction data to reproduce the PUF values. We prove security properties and we formally specify the capabilities required by the attacker to break them. Our analysis points out various subtleties, and allows for a systematic comparison between different PUF-based protocols. The mechanized models are easily extensible and can be automatically checked with the Tamarin prover.
Fabrication process introduces some inherent variability to the attributes of transistors (in particular length, widths, oxide thickness). As a result, every chip is physically unique. Physical uniqueness of microelectronics components can be used for multiple security applications. Physically Unclonable Functions (PUFs) are built to extract the physical uniqueness of microelectronics components and make it usable for secure applications. However, the microelectronics components used by PUFs designs suffer from external, environmental variations that impact the PUF behavior. Variations of temperature gradients during manufacturing can bias the PUF responses. Variations of temperature or thermal noise during PUF operation change the behavior of the circuit, and can introduce errors in PUF responses. Detailed knowledge of the behavior of PUFs operating over various environmental factors is needed to reliably extract and demonstrate uniqueness of the chips. In this work, we present a detailed and exhaustive analysis of the behavior of two PUF designs, a ring oscillator PUF and a timing path violation PUF. We have implemented both PUFs using FPGA fabricated by Xilinx, and analyzed their behavior while varying temperature and supply voltage. Our experiments quantify the robustness of each design, demonstrate their sensitivity to temperature and show the impact which supply voltage has on the uniqueness of the analyzed PUFs.