Visible to the public Biblio

Filters: Keyword is content delivery network  [Clear All Filters]
2020-11-02
Xiong, Wenjie, Shan, Chun, Sun, Zhaoliang, Meng, Qinglei.  2018.  Real-time Processing and Storage of Multimedia Data with Content Delivery Network in Vehicle Monitoring System. 2018 6th International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM). :1—4.

With the rapid development of the Internet of vehicles, there is a huge amount of multimedia data becoming a hidden trouble in the Internet of Things. Therefore, it is necessary to process and store them in real time as a way of big data curation. In this paper, a method of real-time processing and storage based on CDN in vehicle monitoring system is proposed. The MPEG-DASH standard is used to process the multimedia data by dividing them into MPD files and media segments. A real-time monitoring system of vehicle on the basis of the method introduced is designed and implemented.

2020-02-18
Saverimoutou, Antoine, Mathieu, Bertrand, Vaton, Sandrine.  2019.  Influence of Internet Protocols and CDN on Web Browsing. 2019 10th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS). :1–5.

The Web ecosystem has been evolving over the past years and new Internet protocols, namely HTTP/2 over TLS/TCP and QUIC/UDP, are now used to deliver Web contents. Similarly, CDNs (Content Delivery Network) are deployed worldwide, caching contents close to end-users to optimize web browsing quality. We present in this paper an analysis of the influence of the Internet protocols and CDN on the Top 10,000 Alexa websites, based on a 12-month measurement campaign (from April 2018 to April 2019) performed via our tool Web View [1]. Part of our measurements are made public, represented on a monitoring website1, showing the results for the Top 50 Alexa Websites plus few specific websites and 8 french websites, suggested by the French Agency in charge of regulating telecommunications. Our analysis of this long-term measurement campaign allows to better analyze the delivery of public websites. For instance, it shows that even if some argue that QUIC optimizes the quality, it is not observed in the real-life since QUIC is not largely deployed. Our method for analyzing CDN delivery in the Web browsing allows us to evaluate its influence, which is important since their usage can decrease the web pages' loading time, on average 43.1% with HTTP/2 and 38.5% with QUIC, when requesting a second time the same home page.

2019-12-18
Kim, Kyoungmin, You, Youngin, Park, Mookyu, Lee, Kyungho.  2018.  DDoS Mitigation: Decentralized CDN Using Private Blockchain. 2018 Tenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN). :693–696.
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks are intense and are targeted to major infrastructure, governments and military organizations in each country. There are a lot of mitigations about DDoS, and the concept of Content Delivery Network (CDN) has been able to avoid attacks on websites. However, since the existing CDN system is fundamentally centralized, it may be difficult to prevent DDoS. This paper describes the distributed CDN Schema using Private Blockchain which solves the problem of participation of existing transparent and unreliable nodes. This will explain DDoS mitigation that can be used by military and government agencies.
2017-09-26
Cangialosi, Frank, Chung, Taejoong, Choffnes, David, Levin, Dave, Maggs, Bruce M., Mislove, Alan, Wilson, Christo.  2016.  Measurement and Analysis of Private Key Sharing in the HTTPS Ecosystem. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. :628–640.

The semantics of online authentication in the web are rather straightforward: if Alice has a certificate binding Bob's name to a public key, and if a remote entity can prove knowledge of Bob's private key, then (barring key compromise) that remote entity must be Bob. However, in reality, many websites' and the majority of the most popular ones-are hosted at least in part by third parties such as Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) or web hosting providers. Put simply: administrators of websites who deal with (extremely) sensitive user data are giving their private keys to third parties. Importantly, this sharing of keys is undetectable by most users, and widely unknown even among researchers. In this paper, we perform a large-scale measurement study of key sharing in today's web. We analyze the prevalence with which websites trust third-party hosting providers with their secret keys, as well as the impact that this trust has on responsible key management practices, such as revocation. Our results reveal that key sharing is extremely common, with a small handful of hosting providers having keys from the majority of the most popular websites. We also find that hosting providers often manage their customers' keys, and that they tend to react more slowly yet more thoroughly to compromised or potentially compromised keys.

2017-08-18
Cangialosi, Frank, Chung, Taejoong, Choffnes, David, Levin, Dave, Maggs, Bruce M., Mislove, Alan, Wilson, Christo.  2016.  Measurement and Analysis of Private Key Sharing in the HTTPS Ecosystem. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. :628–640.

The semantics of online authentication in the web are rather straightforward: if Alice has a certificate binding Bob's name to a public key, and if a remote entity can prove knowledge of Bob's private key, then (barring key compromise) that remote entity must be Bob. However, in reality, many websites' and the majority of the most popular ones-are hosted at least in part by third parties such as Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) or web hosting providers. Put simply: administrators of websites who deal with (extremely) sensitive user data are giving their private keys to third parties. Importantly, this sharing of keys is undetectable by most users, and widely unknown even among researchers. In this paper, we perform a large-scale measurement study of key sharing in today's web. We analyze the prevalence with which websites trust third-party hosting providers with their secret keys, as well as the impact that this trust has on responsible key management practices, such as revocation. Our results reveal that key sharing is extremely common, with a small handful of hosting providers having keys from the majority of the most popular websites. We also find that hosting providers often manage their customers' keys, and that they tend to react more slowly yet more thoroughly to compromised or potentially compromised keys.