Visible to the public Biblio

Filters: Keyword is False Data Detection  [Clear All Filters]
2017-05-16
Yuan, Yali, Kaklamanos, Georgios, Hogrefe, Dieter.  2016.  A Novel Semi-Supervised Adaboost Technique for Network Anomaly Detection. Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems. :111–114.

With the developing of Internet, network intrusion has become more and more common. Quickly identifying and preventing network attacks is getting increasingly more important and difficult. Machine learning techniques have already proven to be robust methods in detecting malicious activities and network threats. Ensemble-based and semi-supervised learning methods are some of the areas that receive most attention in machine learning today. However relatively little attention has been given in combining these methods. To overcome such limitations, this paper proposes a novel network anomaly detection method by using a combination of a tri-training approach with Adaboost algorithms. The bootstrap samples of tri-training are replaced by three different Adaboost algorithms to create the diversity. We run 30 iteration for every simulation to obtain the average results. Simulations indicate that our proposed semi-supervised Adaboost algorithm is reproducible and consistent over a different number of runs. It outperforms other state-of-the-art learning algorithms, even with a small part of labeled data in the training phase. Specifically, it has a very short execution time and a good balance between the detection rate as well as the false-alarm rate.

2017-03-29
Harshaw, Christopher R., Bridges, Robert A., Iannacone, Michael D., Reed, Joel W., Goodall, John R..  2016.  GraphPrints: Towards a Graph Analytic Method for Network Anomaly Detection. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Cyber and Information Security Research Conference. :15:1–15:4.

This paper introduces a novel graph-analytic approach for detecting anomalies in network flow data called GraphPrints. Building on foundational network-mining techniques, our method represents time slices of traffic as a graph, then counts graphlets–-small induced subgraphs that describe local topology. By performing outlier detection on the sequence of graphlet counts, anomalous intervals of traffic are identified, and furthermore, individual IPs experiencing abnormal behavior are singled-out. Initial testing of GraphPrints is performed on real network data with an implanted anomaly. Evaluation shows false positive rates bounded by 2.84% at the time-interval level, and 0.05% at the IP-level with 100% true positive rates at both.

2017-03-20
Amullen, Esther, Lin, Hui, Kalbarczyk, Zbigniew, Keel, Lee.  2016.  Multi-agent System for Detecting False Data Injection Attacks Against the Power Grid. Proceedings of the 2Nd Annual Industrial Control System Security Workshop. :38–44.

A class of cyber-attacks called False Data Injection attacks that target measurement data used for state estimation in the power grid are currently under study by the research community. These attacks modify sensor readings obtained from meters with the aim of misleading the control center into taking ill-advised response action. It has been shown that an attacker with knowledge of the network topology can craft an attack that bypasses existing bad data detection schemes (largely based on residual generation) employed in the power grid. We propose a multi-agent system for detecting false data injection attacks against state estimation. The multi-agent system is composed of software implemented agents created for each substation. The agents facilitate the exchange of information including measurement data and state variables among substations. We demonstrate that the information exchanged among substations, even untrusted, enables agents cooperatively detect disparities between local state variables at the substation and global state variables computed by the state estimator. We show that a false data injection attack that passes bad data detection for the entire system does not pass bad data detection for each agent.