Biblio

Filters: Author is Anderson, Thomas  [Clear All Filters]
2017-03-20
Cheng, Raymond, Scott, William, Ellenbogen, Paul, Howell, Jon, Roesner, Franziska, Krishnamurthy, Arvind, Anderson, Thomas.  2016.  Radiatus: A Shared-Nothing Server-Side Web Architecture. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing. :237–250.

Web applications are a frequent target of successful attacks. In most web frameworks, the damage is amplified by the fact that application code is responsible for security enforcement. In this paper, we design and evaluate Radiatus, a shared-nothing web framework where application-specific computation and storage on the server is contained within a sandbox with the privileges of the end-user. By strongly isolating users, user data and service availability can be protected from application vulnerabilities. To make Radiatus practical at the scale of modern web applications, we introduce a distributed capabilities system to allow fine-grained secure resource sharing across the many distributed services that compose an application. We analyze the strengths and weaknesses of a shared-nothing web architecture, which protects applications from a large class of vulnerabilities, but adds an overhead of 60.7% per server and requires an additional 31MB of memory per active user. We demonstrate that the system can scale to 20K operations per second on a 500-node AWS cluster.

2017-09-26
Woos, Doug, Wilcox, James R., Anton, Steve, Tatlock, Zachary, Ernst, Michael D., Anderson, Thomas.  2016.  Planning for Change in a Formal Verification of the Raft Consensus Protocol. Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs. :154–165.

We present the first formal verification of state machine safety for the Raft consensus protocol, a critical component of many distributed systems. We connected our proof to previous work to establish an end-to-end guarantee that our implementation provides linearizable state machine replication. This proof required iteratively discovering and proving 90 system invariants. Our verified implementation is extracted to OCaml and runs on real networks. The primary challenge we faced during the verification process was proof maintenance, since proving one invariant often required strengthening and updating other parts of our proof. To address this challenge, we propose a methodology of planning for change during verification. Our methodology adapts classical information hiding techniques to the context of proof assistants, factors out common invariant-strengthening patterns into custom induction principles, proves higher-order lemmas that show any property proved about a particular component implies analogous properties about related components, and makes proofs robust to change using structural tactics. We also discuss how our methodology may be applied to systems verification more broadly.