Visible to the public A Comparison of Blockchain-Based Wireless Sensor Network Protocols

TitleA Comparison of Blockchain-Based Wireless Sensor Network Protocols
Publication TypeConference Paper
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsPrimo, Abena
Conference Name2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)
Date PublishedOct. 2020
PublisherIEEE
ISBN Number978-1-7281-9656-5
Keywordsbitcoin, blockchain, compositionality, Consensus algorithm, Human Behavior, location privacy, Location Privacy in Wireless Networks, Metrics, Peer-to-peer computing, pubcrawl, resilience, Resiliency, Scalability, Security and Privacy, Sensors, Throughput, wireless networks, Wireless sensor networks
AbstractWireless sensors are often deployed in environments where it is difficult for them to discern friend from enemy. An example case is a military tactical scenario, where sensors are deployed to map the location of an item but where some of the nodes have been compromised or where there are other malicious nodes present. In this scenario, sharing data with other network nodes may present a critical security risk to the sensor nodes. Blockchain technology, with its ability to house a secure distributed ledger, offers a possible solution. However, blockchain applications for Wireless Sensor Networks suffer from poor latency in block propagation which in turn decreases throughput and network scalability. Several researchers have proposed solutions for improved network throughput. In this work, a comparison of these existing works is performed leading to a taxonomy of existing algorithms. Characteristics consistently found in algorithms reporting improved throughput are presented and, later, these characteristics are used in the development of a new algorithm for improving throughput. The proposed algorithm utilizes a proof-of- authority consensus algorithm with a node trust-based scheme. The proposed algorithm shows strong results over the base case algorithm and was evaluated with blockchain network simulations of up to 20000 nodes.
URLhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9298055/
DOI10.1109/UEMCON51285.2020.9298055
Citation Keyprimo_comparison_2020