Biblio

(No abstract.)

The quantity of information that is collected and stored in computer systems continues to grow rapidly. At the same time, the sensitivity of such information (e.g., detailed medical records) often makes such information valuable to both external attackers, who may obtain information by compromising a system, and malicious insiders, who may misuse information by exercising their authorization. To mitigate compromises and deter misuse, the security administrators of these resources often deploy various types of intrusion and misuse detection systems, which provide alerts of suspicious events that are worthy of follow-up review. However, in practice, these systems may generate a large number of false alerts, wasting the time of investigators. Given that security administrators have limited budget for investigating alerts, they must prioritize certain types of alerts over others. An important challenge in alert prioritization is that adversaries may take advantage of such behavior to evade detection - specifically by mounting attacks that trigger alerts that are less likely to be investigated. In this paper, we model alert prioritization with adaptive adversaries using a Stackelberg game and introduce an approach to compute the optimal prioritization of alert types. We evaluate our approach using both synthetic data and a real-world dataset of alerts generated from the audit logs of an electronic medical record system in use at a large academic medical center.

Smart water networks can provide great benefits to our society in terms of efficiency and sustainability. However, smart capabilities and connectivity also expose these systems to a wide range of cyber attacks, which enable cyber-terrorists and hostile nation states to mount cyber-physical attacks. Cyber-physical attacks against critical infrastructure, such as water treatment and distribution systems, pose a serious threat to public safety and health. Consequently, it is imperative that we improve the resilience of smart water networks. We consider three approaches for improving resilience: redundancy, diversity, and hardening. Even though each one of these “canonical” approaches has been thoroughly studied in prior work, a unified theory on how to combine them in the most efficient way has not yet been established. In this paper, we address this problem by studying the synergy of these approaches in the context of protecting smart water networks from cyber-physical contamination attacks.

Network connectivity is a primary attribute and a characteristic phenomenon of any networked system. A high connectivity is often desired within networks; for instance to increase robustness to failures, and resilience against attacks. A typical approach to increasing network connectivity is to strategically add links; however, adding links is not always the most suitable option. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach to improving network connectivity, that is by making a small subset of nodes and edges “trusted,” which means that such nodes and edges remain intact at all times and are insusceptible to failures. We then show that by controlling the number of trusted nodes and edges, any desired level of network connectivity can be obtained. Along with characterizing network connectivity with trusted nodes and edges, we present heuristics to compute a small number of such nodes and edges. Finally, we illustrate our results on various networks.