Visible to the public BiblioConflict Detection Enabled

Filters: Author is Paul Kröger  [Clear All Filters]
2021-08-11
Werner Damm, Martin Fränzle, Willem Hagemann, Paul Kröger, Astrid Rakow.  2019.  Dynamic Conflict Resolution Using Justification Based Reasoning. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Formal Reasoning about Causation, Responsibility, and Explanations in Science and Technology. 308:47–65.
Martin Fränzle, Paul Kröger.  2020.  Guess What I'm Doing! - Rendering Formal Verification Methods Ripe for the Era of Interacting Intelligent Systems. Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation: Applications - 9th International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, ISoLA 2020, Rhodes, Greece, October 20-30, 2020, Proceedings, Part III. 12478:255-272.
2020-10-12
Martin Fränzle, Paul Kröger.  2020.  Guess what I’m doing! Rendering formal verification methods ripe for the era of interacting intelligent systems. 9th International Symposium On Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation.
2020-10-01
Martin Fränzle, Mingshuai Chen, Paul Kröger.  2019.  In memory of Oded Maler: automatic reachability analysis of hybrid-state automata. ACM SIGLOG News. 6(1)

Hybrid automata are an elegant formal model seamlessly integrating differential equations representing continuous dynamics with automata capturing switching behavior. Since the introduction of the computational model more than a quarter of a century ago [Maler et al. 1992], its algorithmic verification has been an area of intense research. Within this note, which is dedicated to Oded Maler (1957--2018) as one of the inventors of the model, we are trying to delineate major lines of attack to the reachability problem for hybrid automata. Due to its relation to system safety, the reachability problem is a prototypical verification problem for hybrid discrete-continuous system dynamics.

2019-08-21
Werner Damm, Martin Fränzle, Willem Hagemann, Paul Kröger, Astrid Rakow.  2019.  Justification Based Reasoning in Dynamic Conflict Resolution. 4th Workshop on Formal Reasoning about Causation, Responsibility, and Explanations in Science and Technology.

We study conflict situations that dynamically arise in traffic scenarios, where different agents try to achieve their set of goals and have to decide on what to do based on their local perception.
We distinguish several types of conflicts for this setting. In order to enable modelling of conflict situations and the reasons for conflicts, we present a logical framework that adopts concepts from epistemic and modal logic, justification and temporal logic. Using this framework, we illustrate how conflicts can be identified and how we derive a chain of justifications leading to this conflict. We discuss how conflict resolution can be done when a vehicle has local, incomplete information, vehicle to vehicle communication (V2V) and partially ordered goals.