Biblio
This paper puts forward a dynamic reduction method of renewable energy based on N-1 safety standard of power system, which is suitable for high-voltage distribution network and can reduce the abandoned amount of renewable energy to an ideal level. On the basis of AC sensitivity coefficient, the optimization method of distribution factor suitable for single line or multi-line disconnection is proposed. Finally, taking an actual high-voltage distribution network in Germany as an example, the simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively limit the line load, and can greatly reduce the line load with less RES reduction.
This paper presents a new approach for a dynamic curtailment method for renewable energy sources that guarantees fulfilling of (n-1)-security criteria of the system. Therefore, it is applicable to high voltage distribution grids and has compliance to their planning guidelines. The proposed dynamic curtailment method specifically reduces the power feed-in of renewable energy sources up to a level, where no thermal constraint is exceeded in the (n-1)-state of the system. Based on AC distribution factors, a new formulation of line outage distribution factors is presented that is applicable for outages consisting of a single line or multiple segment lines. The proposed method is tested using a planning study of a real German high voltage distribution grid. The results show that any thermal loading limits are exceeded by using the dynamic curtailment approach. Therefore, a significant reduction of the grid reinforcement can be achieved by using a small amount of curtailed annual energy from renewable energy sources.
This paper proposes a practical time-phased model to analyze the vulnerability of power systems over a time horizon, in which the scheduled maintenance of network facilities is considered. This model is deemed as an efficient tool that could be used by system operators to assess whether how their systems become vulnerable giving a set of scheduled facility outages. The final model is presented as a single level Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) problem solvable with commercially available software. Results attained based on the well-known IEEE 24-Bus Reliability Test System (RTS) appreciate the applicability of the model and highlight the necessity of considering the scheduled facility outages in assessing the vulnerability of a power system.
Contingency analysis is a critical activity in the context of the power infrastructure because it provides a guide for resiliency and enables the grid to continue operating even in the case of failure. In this paper, we augment this concept by introducing SOCCA, a cyber-physical security evaluation technique to plan not only for accidental contingencies but also for malicious compromises. SOCCA presents a new unified formalism to model the cyber-physical system including interconnections among cyber and physical components. The cyber-physical contingency ranking technique employed by SOCCA assesses the potential impacts of events. Contingencies are ranked according to their impact as well as attack complexity. The results are valuable in both cyber and physical domains. From a physical perspective, SOCCA scores power system contingencies based on cyber network configuration, whereas from a cyber perspective, control network vulnerabilities are ranked according to the underlying power system topology.
Contingency analysis is a critical activity in the context of the power infrastructure because it provides a guide for resiliency and enables the grid to continue operating even in the case of failure. In this paper, we augment this concept by introducing SOCCA, a cyber-physical security evaluation technique to plan not only for accidental contingencies but also for malicious compromises. SOCCA presents a new unified formalism to model the cyber-physical system including interconnections among cyber and physical components. The cyber-physical contingency ranking technique employed by SOCCA assesses the potential impacts of events. Contingencies are ranked according to their impact as well as attack complexity. The results are valuable in both cyber and physical domains. From a physical perspective, SOCCA scores power system contingencies based on cyber network configuration, whereas from a cyber perspective, control network vulnerabilities are ranked according to the underlying power system topology.