Visible to the public Comparative analysis of Governmental Countermeasures to cyber attacks

TitleComparative analysis of Governmental Countermeasures to cyber attacks
Publication TypeConference Paper
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsSoo, L. H.
Conference Name2015 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)
Date Publishedsep
KeywordsComparative Analysis, Computer crime, Computer hacking, control tower, CTIIC, Cyber Attacks, Cyber incident, cyber security response capability, cyber-attacks, Government, governmental countermeasures, Inductors, information sharing EO, Internet, Interviews, ISAO, KHNP, Law, ministry of industry, North Korea, presidential secretary, pubcrawl170109, retaliatory action, sanctions EO, security of data, Sony, South Korea, strengthening national cyber security posture initiative, United States, US government
Abstract

Sony in United States and KHNP in South Korea were hit by a series of cyberattacks late in 2014 that were blamed on North Korea. U.S. president Obama responded strongly and positively as control tower, and led Sony do not surrender to hacker's demand. U.S government demonstrated retaliatory action against North Korea under the proportional principle, blacklisted 3 North Korean entities and 10 officials. That days, there was the outrage of internet of North Korea. In order to enhance the cyber security response capability, U.S created a new office, CTIIC and encouraged the development of ISAOs, and made Sanctions EO, Information Sharing EO etc. KHNP and the Ministry of Industry rectified incidents itself early period when cyber incident arose, and the situation did not recovered as quickly as desired. S. Korea had not retaliation actions, otherwise called for closer global cooperation against cyber-attacks. To enhance national cyber security and resilience, S. Korea government created the new post of presidential secretary for cyber security and draw up `Strengthening National Cyber Security Posture' initiative.

DOI10.1109/CCST.2015.7389664
Citation Keysoo_comparative_2015