Biblio
The “Internet of Things” (IoT) is internetworking of physical devices known as 'things', algorithms, equipment and techniques that allow communication with another device, equipment and software over the network. And with the advancement in data communication, every device must be connected via the Internet. For this purpose, we use resource-constrained sensor nodes for collecting data from homes, offices, hospitals, industries and data centers. But various vulnerabilities may ruin the functioning of the sensor nodes. Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) is a standardized, secure routing protocol designed for the 6LoWPAN IoT network. It's a proactive routing protocol that works on the destination-oriented topology to perform safe routing. The Sinkhole is a networking attack that destroys the topology of the RPL protocol as the attacker node changes the route of all the traffic in the IoT network. In this paper, we have given a survey of Sinkhole attacks in IoT and proposed different methods for preventing and detecting these attacks in a low-power-based IoT network.
Bus factor is a metric that identifies how resilient is the project to the sudden engineer turnover. It states the minimal number of engineers that have to be hit by a bus for a project to be stalled. Even though the metric is often discussed in the community, few studies consider its general relevance. Moreover, the existing tools for bus factor estimation focus solely on the data from version control systems, even though there exists other channels for knowledge generation and distribution. With a survey of 269 engineers, we find that the bus factor is perceived as an important problem in collective development, and determine the highest impact channels of knowledge generation and distribution in software development teams. We also propose a multimodal bus factor estimation algorithm that uses data on code reviews and meetings together with the VCS data. We test the algorithm on 13 projects developed at JetBrains and compared its results to the results of the state-of-the-art tool by Avelino et al. against the ground truth collected in a survey of the engineers working on these projects. Our algorithm is slightly better in terms of both predicting the bus factor as well as key developers compared to the results of Avelino et al. Finally, we use the interviews and the surveys to derive a set of best practices to address the bus factor issue and proposals for the possible bus factor assessment tool.